Dave Heil wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote: (and again violates "nettiquete" by not citing his
attributions)

A information bulletin is
a vague word.

"AN" information bulletin" may be a vague TERM, Todd.

Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two
words.

Hi Dave...You and I know that, but Todd doesn't. That's why I said
"term", rahter than "word".

Any just-about-to-be-graduated-from-third-grader wouldn't have
taht mistake...But Todd did.

However that will be up to the Engineer in your FCC District
to
decide upon.

But hey, I'm there and will propbably be there a
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNGGGG=ADGGG TIME so enjoy the
show!!!!!!!!

If it's a "show", you're violating the law.

This guy obviously has some issues, Steve. Tread lightly lest you be
accused under the ADA with cruelty to the mentally handicapped.

Mark Morgan tired that with me...remember! Didn't work then,
either!

Todd's claims to inventions, to a recent state administered IQ test,
his
inability to put together a properly constructed sentence, his
inability
to spell, his lurches back and forth between upper/lower case
dim-wittedness and PROFANE UPPER CASE RANTING and his delusions about
the FCC being out to get him, all mark him as someone who is not
quite
right.

Thereby providing even MORE justification for the FCC from
preventing his ascendency to commercial broadcasting.

I doubt that Todd is airing any informational
bulletins/broadcasts/shows
at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by
regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door.

He still doesn't get it...

His "opinion" doesn NOT meet the test of an "information
bulletin", no matter HOW impressed he is with the sound of his own
voice.

As to his blog: Who's reading it?

I can't say I "read" it, however what parts I did read were
rambling, paranoid and accusatory.

What an idiot.

Good to see you, Dave...How's things?

73

Steve, K4YZ