When I asked the respondent where his/her self righteousness was
after the attacks on my daughet, this was the response I got and my
reply:

(QUOTE: HEADERS AGAIN SNIPPED FOR PRIVACY OF RESPONDENT)

The shots against your daughter are low-life, as was the one you made
about Jim Smith and his daughter.

There were no "shots", (Name Deleted), ...The point was that a
pretty face was able to sell radios. There are others in QST, CQ, etc.

If you see anything more sinister than that, I submit that YOU
have a very serious problem.

But the difference is that you are present on rrap to defend your
family while the Smith family is not represented on rrap against your
"Musta beem selling SOMEthing!" insinuations.

I reiterate the above. You are the one with a problem, (Anonymous
Writer). You're looking for evil in everything you see. I could quote
Genesis in RRAP and you'd portray me as the evil landlord.

Having said that, I must credit you with having the nads not to hide
your attack behind an anonymous email address.

There was no attack. You are still challenged to cite an
"attack". There was only (YOU) looking for a fight. At least you kept
this one private. Bravo.

UNQUOTE:

I think there's some real significant mental issues with someone
who finds some sinister evil in commenting that pretty faces sell
radios (an "attack", as (s/he) called it), as opposed to those who
defile the memory of a dead child.

But...ya pays your money and you takes your choice.

Steve, K4YZ