bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Hey Brian...Where's your substantiation to your "Tech's
being
chased away" claim...?!?!

I own no Tech's.

Obviously.

You also do not own a sense of pride or appreciation for the
worth
of character. Otherwise you might try to own up to some of your
assertions with some substantiation of their validity.

Go ask the anon e-mailer where all the Techs have gone.

Shall we just add that to your growing list of "Stupid
Things
Brian P Burke Has Said On RRAP But Can't Prove" list...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

"Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio." Hi, hi!

Back to the out-of-context, "this is all I have to throw at
him"
stuff, eh, Brian...???

That's over a year old now...Yet YOU, on the other hand,
continue
to add to your volumes of dumb assertions.

Still no answers, eh, Brian...???

Steve, K4YZ

You claim that people's opinions are wrong. Keep knocking yourself
out.

No...I claim that your assertion that ARES is "dependent" on aging
men who can't/won't respond due to age/infirmity or are over obligated
is misleading and untrue.

I've asked you SEVERAL TIMES now to show me JUST ONE example of
some situation where ARES was asked to respond to a situation but
couldn't due to any of the criteria YOU cited.

YOU claimed that "unlicensed devices play a major role" in
"emergency comms". I've asked your to substantiate THAT claim with some
sort of valid reference, but you;ve balked at that one, too.

You claim, I ask you to validate the claim. You refuse. No facts
= invalid claim.

It really is THAT simple.

Steve, K4YZ