On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, K4YZ wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
To Steve, K4YZ, an ###hole without a life:
Always pleasant to hear from you, Dieter...Always a cheerful
word...
I'm not here to play games with you. You accuse me of
"disappearing." I see
that it never occurred to you that perhaps I read this group exactly
ONCE PER
WEEK (time permitting) and that I may have been done for that day.
Unlike you,
I have a life - I don't sit in front of a computer 24 hours per day
waiting for
the next post I can troll a response from like you apparently do.
Well, Dieter, the LAST time you exchanged posts it was over several
days.
And you imply that such is not consistent with one visit per week?
Also, you often pull this "I can't talk becasue I am better than
you" routine when you're getting your virtual nose bloodied in your OWN
trolls and accusations.
Like this one...
You popped into the group after several weeks absence, called me a
back stabber and ###hole for having allegedly posted "secretly" to some
other newsgroup reader.
Since those posts didn't show up at my ISP's copy of the newsgroup, it was a
valid conclusion.
I told you I didn't post to the reader and you called me more
names without provocation.
I found the posts, QUOTED THEM WITH HEADERS FROM THIS FORUM where
they had been cross-posted, and not a word of apology from you after
you had been proven wrong not once, but THREE TIMES, DIETER!
Nor will you ever get one; I have nothing to apologize to you for.
Of course, any REAL concept of what point I had actually raised is so
far over
your head, monkeys have a better chance of typing out Shakespeare's
works
before you will ever understand it - or ANY point raised by anyone
else,
intelligent or not, ever. Therefore, it is pointless trying to
explain it to
you for you will NEVER understand. You lack such a capability.
Your POINT in those particular exchanges, initiated by you, by the
way, were about how I was allegedly talking about you on some third
party newsgroup reader.
Completely clueless once again. I referred to the violations of law by AR
Newsline in how they solicit donations then use the funds for a function
unrelated to the purpose they solicited for; not some petty backstabing post
you made in some other forum about me. You're simply too stupid to even follow
that - and you just proved it above.
It's been proven that I didn't do what you accused me of doing,
Dieter.
I already know you're a liar, so what's another lie?
You've not apologized.
Nor SHOULD I.
Kinda makes you the ###hole, now doesn't it, Buddy...?!?!
Your own, continuous ranting has shown this to the world. Poor
Steve, who
permanently and publically branded himself a fool.
In your opinion.
And based on the responses by others, the view of MANY OTHER PEOPLE of you.
Of course that's ALSO the opinion of a cowardly, low-life who jumps
in with accusations of others allegedly "dissing" him, yet when proven
otherwise, skulks off and stays out of sight for three weeks.
Again, clueless that someone else may have a life. Let's see: Steve knows
that I'm a tax expert and my return coincides with the passing of a major tax
deadline. Was that too hard for him to comprehend? Must be - since he
completely missed it as noted above.
It's also the opinon of "Mr I'm Going To Turn Bill Pasternak Into
The Feds", speaking of "continuous ranting.....
You'll be kissing my ass after he gets convicted.
Try again, Dieter...And start the next one off with "I erroneously
accused you of talking behind my back and I apologize..."
Wrong. I CAUGHT you doing it, weasel, and everyone else knows it. If I were
actually wrong, SOMEONE other than you would have said something; no one has.
|