May 4th 05, 06:32 PM
|
|
|
From: (John=A0Smith)
So, you think that harassing a man, such as
being done here, would NOT be found to be
offensive to the general public???
I believe "harassment" is something that must be proved beyond a doubt
by a court of law, not an internet usenet opinion. In this specific
incident,Dogie not only initiated and began the harassment of many on
here, mopar included, he libeled many good folks here. Once the court
was made aware Dogie not only initiated such behavior, but continued a
campaign of personal electronic "harassment" for many years, they would
conclude he has no ground for suit. Of this, I am absolutely confident.
You think the general public would support
your abuse of this man???
Ummm,,,,what I 'think", is the hordes would come out of the woodwork to
give proper testimony (via a notarized statement) to the court
concerning Dogie's abuse along with proper examples. Mopar's statements
are quite benign compared to the psycho libelant Dogie's comments and
threats.
Well, maybe so, or maybe you should rethink
that....
Regards,
John
Dude,,,you ought check this libelant's entrance into the group. Google
N8WWM in this group, place his posts in chronological order and enjoy a
classic textbook piece of usenet history of one being driven underground
because of his own criminality, unprovoked attacks, incompetence, and
sickness. A real treat.
|