May 5th 05, 08:23 PM
|
|
|
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:29:25 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Freeband=A0sucks)
where can we find one?
-
The technology is there,,you just have to -learn- it. Tell you
what,,think about part 15 transceivers,,,,think about chips,..... now
think about different modes,,outside the box....think about
UHF.....now,,,if you still are confused, please explain why automatic
hopping of freqs on the freeband is such a difficult concept for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp this idea, forget about even casually
mentioning digital sequencing to you,,,,you'd win the pool!!! : )
I've been watching this topic with some
interest. IMHO the only true method of SS is
the direct sequencing method.
Yea,,that's what i meant when I said "digital" sequencing.
Frequency
hopping sort of "cheats" the concept of a
wideband and barely distinguishable SS
system.
Yea,,I guess it could be seen that way,,,but,,why couldn't the
technology be programmed to hop "wider" (for lack of a better term at
the moment)?
Direct sequence is also more secure than FH.
I'm not up on the latest encryption technique regrading this technology,
but take your word for it. But,,,why would a direct sequence (definite
pattern) be more secire than a random pattern?
Nonetheless, frequency hopping is considered
spread spectrum in today's marketplace.
Yep it is.
As far as using SS on 11 meters, well...... First
off, there are no commercial CB radios made
with this technology.
I never said there was. I said the technology was there and blew a
gasket in a certain poster's gray matter and now he is all wrapped up in
himself blathering incoherently about a cb radio when I referred the
freeband.
Even hams have been slow to embrace it.
That's not to say that enterprising
experimenters have not played with it on 11
.meters.
BINGO!
Utilizing cordless phones and transverters
might yield satisfactory results. I'm sure there
may be a few that have. But it's hardly in
widespread use.
Agreed.
Dave
."Sandbagger"
n3cvj
|