Thread: SO2R Policy?
View Single Post
  #123   Report Post  
Old June 20th 05, 07:02 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Dan/W4NTI" on Sun 19 Jun 2005 22:36


"bb" wrote in message
oups.com...
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote in message


Indeed it does. David has articulated, and Dan has agreed that a Tech
really isn't worth much as an amateur if they don't do the things that
Dave, Dan and Dee want them to be doing. I'm sure that your attitudes
spill over into your communication with those unworthy Techs.



Not only a Dip****, but a dumbass as well, eh N0IMD? Just keep making up
what you want.

The FCC wants the Technician to UPGRADE. So do we......whats wrong with
that?

Dip****/Dumbass


Plenty WRONG, "dip**** dumbass Dan." FCC did NOT "want anyone" to
do anything but obey the law.

Here's a clue, you southern-fried Einstein: FCC is NOT in ANY
position to endorse or motivate any radio amateur. They aren't
charterd by Congress to do so.

"Wanting anyone to upgrade" is a subject for clubs and private
organizations. Mostly that means the ARRL. Here's another clue:
The ARRL does NOT regulate U.S. amateur radio...regardless of
what they infer.

Sunnuvagun! [thank you Hans for originating that into the
mainstream of American colloquialisms over a
century or so back... :-) ]


Thanks for the insight into the "Mind of Dan."


Just tellin the truth and you cain't stand it.


Tsk, dip**** dumbass Dan, the southern-fried Einstein (wannabe).

Good luck with that now...