Subject: SX-28 Scarce? I Don't Think so!!
From: (Mike Andrews)
Date: 1/13/04 7:23 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id:
AComarow wrote:
Oh, okay. But no more bogus R-390 claims.
^^^^^
"bogus" "_BOGUS_" You dare refer to a claim of the certain and
undeniable beauty of the original R-390 (non-"A") as "*BOGUS*"?
Aroint thee, foul fiend, and return to the depths of Hades, whence
thou camest, and wherein thou shouldst be confined "le olam, om"!
And if you can't tell I'm kidding, I'll spell it out for you.
--
"bing-bong. Brimish Rull regret that mumble maz bem dermumble a mir
mumble mumble bimble late. Passengers mizzing to mumble rimble mumble
are advised to momble mar at murmble. Thank you mor mumble mimbling
Brimble mum. bing-bong." -- Gary "Wolf" Barnes, the Monastery
Okay, okay. Nobody ever said 390 junkies are rational. Look, I owned one. I was
dazzled by the Rube Goldberg machinery behind the front panel. All those gears!
Cams! Moving arms! But since when did defense contractors build for show as
opposed to efficiency and functionality? C'mon. Name one military radio that
looked better than its civilian equivalent. At least the SP-600 didn't look
that much different.
Avery W3AVE