One of my purposes in scraping off the rust from 34 years'
of unused E-M theory was specifically so that I could evaluate
the claims made for the CFA.

I was intrigued by the claims but at no times taken in by them.

But yes - I exposed my ignorance but not any weakness, but there is never
any
problem with such exposure if it is done in an open spirit of eagerness to
learn!

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
From 'inventor' Hately's original descriptions of his CFA, it is so
glaringly obviously a load of nonsense that anybody who takes the time
to mathematically expose the fraud, himself exposes his own weakness
and uncertainty in the subject and has already been partially taken in
by it.
Waste no more time.