"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:
I think a woman "taking a free ride" on her husbands license
Oh buhruther, that is almost a scarey comment--but I won't go there
are
probably not a significant number to really thwart the benefits which
are possible.
Hmmmm, yeah, I am not sure how anything would thwart a benefit...(?)
Let's face it, marriage too is becoming a thing of the
past, and certainly is no longer a real lifetime commitment for the
younger generations. Gay marriage is probably the final nail in that
coffin.
Uh oh. Yeah, 'dem gays is ruining everything. It's because of them that
parents don't raise their kids with enough gumption to make smart decisions
on love and marriage, and having kids. It's because of them that skillsets
to handle the baggage of everyday life aren't instilled by our society and,
therefore, our children. It's because of them (gays--to remind everyone)
that parents and educators are too busy getting their pockets lined and so
can't raise kids to have more dignity and respect than to go out as a
teen-ager and get pregnant. It's because of them that, well hell, let's
just lay it out there for everyone to see: it's because of those darned
friggin' faggots and lesbians that our whole damned world has gone to hell
in a handbasket.
The younger women of today are a different breed and don't want to be
seen as "getting something for nothing." (which might imply, at least
to some, that they are less able or intelligent)
OK, so wait a minute. One sentiment you express is that gays have ruined
the institution of marriage. The next, you are saying that "the younger
women of today" (spoken, it seems, as a true male chauvinist asshole, by the
way) have, ummmm, higher standards? Is this the same women who get all
those divorces, screw other womens' husbands, suck their boss'
you-know-whats, etc., as you mentioned above? The very same women who,
today, are so wrapped up in using their bodies and sex to get anything and
anywhere that the workplace has become a disgusting display of seething sex
fashions? Because, I want to make sure we are on the same page...uh, if
that's even possible?
OK, back to reality. You are one piece of work. I am pretty convinced that
it's ridiculous for me to mention here that you are spewing a whole huge
trashcan of idiocy over: A WOMAN TALKING ON HAM RADIO WITH HER HUSBAND AS
CONTROL OPERATOR!!!! For friggin' cryin' out loud, dude, get a chill pill.
I would venture a guess that at least half of under 35 year old women
would never stand for a free ride on their husbands license--choosing
to make a point they "have what it takes." (today's women are much
more competitive)
You friggin' nitwit. FIRST, you'd have to get half of the under-35 year old
women the slightest bit interested IN HAM RADIO and/or AT LEAST, help them
let their wimpy-assed husbands get into it and get a radio. THEN come back
to me and discuss this flood of estrogen on YOUR ham bands, k? Where'd
y'all drag this one up from?
I feel the dropping of CW will open this hobby up to these women.
Love it. Hey, Jim? While you're sitting there laughing hysterically (
)
Get a load of this: "these" women.
Even if they are only dating a guy which is in amateur radio, it may
be enough to prompt them into studying and grabbing a license of their
own--especially if the boyfriend is smart enough to set up a
competitive spirit and invoke the challenge. grin
John
Oh my good Lord. If you were sitting across the table from me, I'd have to
see your--uh, Dee, please close your eyes, oh wait, I can put it this way:
see your "thing." How tiny is that thing? You are speaking of
strong-willed, competive, and--I'll inject here--independent women, of whom
it is obvious you have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE. Because THIS
strong-willed, competitve, independent woman, would shrivel your mighty
little thing up in half-a second and throw you back out to the curb. By the
way, if the women you have been around need your permission, or your
guidance, to get competitive and have the challenge "invoked," you need to
get out of that closet you're in.
Oh my gawsh...now, I am going to go back to normal and get ready for the
office--where a *FEW* of us women still get around on our own. My little
pal here, to whom I am responding with this post, is obviously surrounded by
idiot women, the only types he can deal with.
Kim W5TIT
"Kim" wrote in message
...
"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
oups.com...
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-05-143A1.doc
73 de Jim, N2EY
Well now we will see if the Techs are paying attention. If they
are, we
should (but I bet we won't) see a major increase in people taking
element
3
over the next several months as the FCC should have this wrapped up
before
their CSCEs expire.
And now we'll see how many people have been "kept out by the Morse
code".
Of course we'll need to monitor over several years to see if their
is a
trend. A few months won't tell us a thing.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
I am a TechPlus who never upgraded to General, or any other class.
There
are some considerations that may set me apart from the broad (no pun
intended) population of the ARS:
I am a female
I have a husband who is a General Class (i.e., not sure how many
licensees
are spouses to each other)--and I could, technically, get on HF
General
Class freqs any time I wanted
I enjoy simple ragchewing and emergency communications at a local
level WHEN
I am even "hooked up"
I enjoy the "quiet" mode of communicating--HF makes way too much
noise
There's probably some other differentiating items, and there may be
no
correlation at all.
Kim W5TIT
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----