RadioBanter - View Single Post

July 23rd 05, 02:25 PM

wrote:
From: Mike Coslo on Jul 22, 4:01 pm

wrote:
From: Michael Coslo on Fri 22 Jul 2005 13:37

Why are you sounding insecure? The FCC defines U.S. amateur
radio. You don't define U.S. amateur radio.

Insecure? So are the others who *know* how it is to be defined also
insecure?

Tsk. Don't try that ploy. THE FCC DEFINES AMATEUR RADIO
IN THE UNITED STATES. Period. They grant the licenses for
same.

Your "answer" doesn't answer the question, Lennie.

Poor attempt at a redirect.

Try to stay focussed.

"Focused", Lennie.

Webster's refers. Or are you just "mad" again...?!?!

"Bright people wanting to experiment" aren't going to fall in love
with a radio service demanding all below-30-MHz-privileged
individuals demonstrate telegraphy skills...especially when
that skill goes back 161 years! :-)

Lots of bright students don't want to learn anything that they don't
think is relevant.

Har! That's one of the WEAKEST arguments mumbled by so many.

No, it's not.

It's still as "real" today as it was when I was in grade school,
and probably when your grandfather was in grade school, Lennie.

I don't think I've ever met any student in any learning enviroment
that didn't want to "cut through the BS" and jsut "learn what I need to
know..."

The FCC is NOT an academic institution and licensees are NOT
"students"...NOT even prospective licensees going for a test.

(Oh jeeze...same Lennie crap, fermented and dropped on the door
step again...)

But Part 97 DOES mandate that the Amateur Radio Service serve as a
training enviroment for self-education and training.

Unless they set the goals, what are they to train for?

Actually, that "argument" is total bull#### OUT of the academic
arena.

You and Markie must have shareware'd that dictionary of
profanities, Lennie.

ALL the OTHER radio services (except maritime radio on
the Great Lakes) have GIVEN UP on morse code for communications.

A-hem.....

(reading back across header on top...
'rec.radio.AMATEUR.policy'....)

It simply hasn't proven to be "better" than other modes, takes
longer, and no longer "gets through" better.

"Takes longer" than what? You taking that Extra right out of the
box?

All you are doing with that "argument" is really enforcing a
sort of tribal myth, aka a "hazing" ritual. Note: The FCC
isn't a fraternity house either.

And you're lying again. Sheeesh...couldn't keep it to even
marginally valid arguments, could you...?!?!

I really do NOT know what YOU are writing about...some of the time.

Funny...

We've thought the same of you a LOT of the times...

Everyone is hated by someone. If a person allows themselves to be
bothered by it, they are a poor baby indeed.

No, sweetums, YOU got the non-sequitur. Note what I said about
K4YZ: Anyone simply disagreeing with him is ACCUSED to be
HATING HAM RADIO! Search all you want through Google and you
will find him using that "phrase of hate." Do YOU want to be
like him?

No hate, Lennie.

I just don't tolerate liars.

You're a documented liar. You're more verbose and grammatically
correct than other liars in this forum (specifically N0IMD and KB9RQZ)
but you're a liar none-the-less.

Feeling "hated" because so few agree with your self-proclaimed
"definitions" of What It Is All About?

If 50 million people believe a foolish thing is true, it remains a
foolish thing.

"50 million people in WHAT?" Where are you dreaming today?

Hello? Concentrate on the thread subject.

EVERYONE PAY ATTENTION.

The newsgroup moderator has spoken.

Carry on, Lennie...

Steve, K4YZ