K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order

In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?)

was complete is complete

No, it wasn't.

yes it was

No, it wasn't.

was and remains a complete sentence

No, it wasn't.

learn english

I know English.

then use english

I do.

nope

You're the one with a problem, markie.

i admit to mine grow up and do the same


you are still unable to understand that you are demnding I read and
respond to your post in order, and then claiming you don't understand
what in order means

In order to WHAT...?!?!

in order period

how stupid are you?


USE CAPITALIZATION!

doesn't help with you

USE PUNCTUATION!

does not help with you

you don't understand english


What you're writing is "English" only by loose association.

you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre
calling you on something

Bull####

non response

For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know
why...

you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some
thing i can't even tell

Bull####

I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational
replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to
another, etc etc.

of course one reads posts and responds to them

You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it
any less true.

nO I did not ignore it I dismissed it since as yuo should know on
USEnet if you post message A then B then C I may se them as C then A
then B

cuting out stevie changing the subject, and making remarks with zero
relanance to the issue at hand



Therefore there is no logical sense in expecting that I will read and
respond to your posts in the order you wrote them

You don't seem to have that probelm with other posters,

most don't post as much as yourself stevie nd no one but you expects me
to look in another thread for a correction before I coment on the one
in fornt of me

more evding the subject


more juvi stuff

you go on blaming me for your misdeeds

Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I
acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed.

not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether

Nope.

In the very next post.

not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were
called on it twice

more evasion

Nope.

Nothing to evade.

only your misdeeds

No misdeeds on my part to evade, Markie.

your misdeeds are almost beyond counting

You lie
you cheat
you comit public fraud
you stalk
you harrass
you threaten
you libel
you forge

more steve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words