K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness
than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure
does the rest.
which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and
harrass folks
"essentially"
No, it's not.
yes of course it is
And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you
think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!"
and I have answered it becuase you are nuts
That's an answer?
yes it is
cuting stevie rants
Yet here you are stirring the pot.
showing what you were trying was blackmail
I never tried to "blackmail" you.
You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes
"blackmail", Markie.
it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat
cuting libel
And what target? What threat?
me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your
demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued
harrasment unless I do as YOU say
What threats?
you threats
One Shot one kill...
your threats to contact UP officals and (do something)\
your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago
why do you need everything repeated and again and agian
What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?!
You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum.
but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by
threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands
that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not
your prefromed it
It is all blackmail
What blackmail?
In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to
gain from some act or threat of violence against you.
no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I
stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that
No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor
did any potential gain exist.
wrong
you made the threat and stood to gain
your actions quailify
Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't.
sure do
Nope.
We will now await your presentation of credentials in
jurisprudence.
you continue to black mail me
You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public
forum.
nope
you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer.
Nope, nope and nope.
"one shot one kill..." Is a threat
Nope.
Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be
taken from in court.
it is in context Killing was never the subject
I never suggested to kill you.
liar
it is a plain and clear threat
That's your rampant paranoia.
one shot one kill is a threat
discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code
You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur
Radio.
another Stevie lie I am making no such sugestion
after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered
Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat
Nope.
sure is
How?
by being one
you are a low level danger
So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you
and your "family".
nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without
backing em up
There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie.
yes there is and you keep making threats
Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face
of evidence to the contrary?
what eveidence?
cuting another lies
Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has
nothing to do your making them
I didn't make any, Markie.
One shot on kill .. is a threat
Nope.
It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my
comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for.
Killing is killing
it was and remains a threat
you are lying in saying otherwise
You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was.
nope
if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the
words to have been illchoosen or something like that
instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of
legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved
in a threatening manner
that it was idle matters not
It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise.
sure was
You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often
Nope.
abolsutely true
Absolutely UNtrue...
But don't let that slow you down...
terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible
There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie.
spelling cop cut
yep there is his name is Steve Robeson
Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again.
just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own
actions, and his own words
Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again.
just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own
actions, and his own words
nothing is Stevies fault
Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality
Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and
again...
cuting a lie
cuting another lie
cuting speling cop
You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut...
yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me,
idly it seems but you continue
cuting spelling cop
I didn't threaten Todd.
you sure did
you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP
(you carried out that threat but it was still a threat
It wasn't a threat.
it sure is
apeartnly it seems an idle one
Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got
what he asked for.
but you threatened to do , and apealently did it
have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him
you realy don't know english do you
you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR
actions
Sure I do.
you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats
Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to
pay a price for them.
yep as expected and predicted
If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and
am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal
charge against me, Markie..
I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short
of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the
internet
It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit
and then see who's side holds up better in court.
more threats
Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity
Sure it is.
And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where
appropriate.
still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim
Ask around.
No one answers yes you have
and you lie about it
Nope.
threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to
the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain
What threats?
your threats
What threats?
the threats typed above
What threats?
You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them".
All YOU do is say "those threats".
There are NO threats.
sure are
not going to retype them and retype em
threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to
the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain
cuting stevie evasion
What evasion?
your evasion
WHAT evasion...?!?!
your eveasion
What "eveasion"...?!?!
yours
I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not
repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so
You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion",
Markie.
lying agian
You've not SUBSTANTIATED either...
you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there,
the rest just piles on
You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate.
yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years
ago, and repaeted again and again
Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we
haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too.
well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that,
everyone but you of course
I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured
that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted".
then where is your thank you
cuting another stevie evasion distrotion
cuting speling cop
You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there.
sure was
Nope.
Oh?
Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is
now a "threat"...?!?!
when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is
"cuopled"
"behavoir"
What "behaviour" do you refer to?
your make threats
by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been
informed your are unwelcome
threatening action with various parties
What threats?
asked and answered
Avoided and evaded by you.
asked and answered
stop harassing people
I'm not harrassing people.
liar
Nope.
you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on
the Air, by what I hear from other hams
Oh?
Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie.
nope
I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air
You post, I respond. Period.
Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was
responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect?
liar you are not a bit sorry
Not a liar and sure I'm sorry.
2 lies with one sentence
Nope.
why do you tell such obvious lies
Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as
truthful?
that is your gig stevie
Nope.
As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll
not be successful.
already have many times
"First Amendment", Markie...
you don't have any right to threaten people
I haven't threatened anyone.
lying again
Nope.
yes One shot one kill is a threat
I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me
Nope, nope and nope.
yep yep and yep
when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would
start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that
lets you out
Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent"
(intelligent) man is a conversation mispent.
more evasion
the 1st amendment does cover that
No, it does not.
QUOTE:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
UNQUOTE:
What IS the
so what?
The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single
word of the First Amendment.
Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that
out...
cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth
Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to
TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake.
no mistake
you keep trying to divert the issue
you have NO right to threaten people
you have NO right to harrass people
you have NO right to stalk people
The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things
nor does any other part of the Constitution
a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably
The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you
alleged it to say.
i was simply using your quoting of the text
that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech
have a legs to stand on
"ois ilegal"
What were you trying to say?
What "hate speech"...?!?!
your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different
you are guilty of threats and hate speech
Nope. Not even close.
sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles
cuting stevie off target rant
You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on
numerous occassions.
stop making threats stopp harassing folks
I'm doing neither.
you keep doing it you lying SoS
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's
go back to insinuating profanites....
not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it
More anger. Even spelled it out this time.
nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I
deem it proper, very calmly
Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie.
IYO
I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I
don't violate the rights of others
so another lie
Nope.
I am not angery with I am disguted by you
You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths
and deceit?
No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity
Then stop doing it.
more off tager Bull****
been doing it for years
cuting stvie distoring context
cuting speling cop
cutng spelling cop
threats harrasment trying to intimadate people
Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible.
never made one
Sure you did.
Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give
you a free ride on the code test.
Lie I said a case could be made
A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty.
So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me,
file it.
If Thought It would yeild anything I would do so but I don't think you
have to money to pay the judgement so it is not worth doing
I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place
So what?
A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did
caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway.
Indeed
but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder,
I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture
Then obviously not enough dedication.
if you like
you don't understand the difference between saying something could be
done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted
Sure I do.
then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims
that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so
often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of
YOUR making
No lie made here.
You made threats of lawsuits under ADA.
nope
I discussed the posiblity
I discussed the pros and cons
I decided against it
you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under
ADA."
I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do
it you have got anything worth talking
I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you!
sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money
The cost would be yours twice over, Markie.
prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made
going to court is such a crap shoot
Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the
countersuit.
nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be
paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your
defense
that applies to you or anyone for that matter
Yep...And they can countersue too.
yea never said otherwise
It is easy to sue in America
not so easy to collect
You sure do like flattering yourself!
more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real
world
There's no metal in my body, Markie.
How would I have metal contact withn the world?
and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a
real crout that is another matter
cuting spelling cop
Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time.
Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's
own way.
really someone is making you read it?
If I want to try an understand what you're saying.
you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can
twist
There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out
of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them!
I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier.
more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case
Nope.
Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille?
nope
but you are of course bashing the disabled
with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse?
What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?!
your clear lack
You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating,
self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion,
Markie?
Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling
If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed
to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again.
more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect
was it another power play?
By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL
"power play".
yea
What would have been the first.
not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many
And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them,
sure...
not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not
that you arre any good at it
cutin spelling cop
Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled
word!
I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie.
liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to
No I didn't.
sure did
Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate
you", Markie...
no claim of such a an exact was ever made
You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here!
But you HAVE left us laughing!
comenting on your words
"Commenting"
Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself
"heard"
I am not "talking to (my)self"...
I am talking ABOUT you.
Steve, K4YZ
|