No, it was directed to the one who uses the e-mail address of
or some such address. He e-mailed me direct with his
comments, and didn't have the courage to leave a "valid" return address for
me to reply. Therefore, I ask that he keep his "group" comments TO the
group. If ya haven't got the balls to accept criticism or a general reply in
return, then don't clutter up my mail box. With the comment as was made, I
must take to the thought that it is HIM this thread was discussing for him
to be so "embarrassed" so as not to supply a "valid" address. I may be
wrong, but so be it. Wouldn't be the first time and damned sure won't be the
last. Quite frankly, if it is him, I really don't give a damned what he does
with his radios. They're his.

Lou

"jakdedert" wrote in message
...
Is that directed at me? If so, I apologize for hitting 'reply' instead of
'reply group.' I must have been having a premature 'senior moment.' I
expect they will become more common as I get more senior.

jak

Lou wrote:
And the next time you write to my personal E-MAIL, leave a valid
address for my reply. Share your comments with the group. Yes, maybe
he is trying to put food on his table. No one would knock him for
that. Just seems a bit odd to tear apart "working" units. That is all
I think anyone is trying to say. There are reasons, I've had them as
I've alluded to... It just seems to by pass common sense though - in
many cases.