dxAce wrote:
"John S." wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:
It's funny how he wants to overthrow a government that is going out of its
way to help spread democracy around the globe and he'll believe any and
everything that would help to stop it.

Who is he.....
Which government...

I like how the opposition to the war
screams that we are killing our people which volunteered to go there in the
first place and believe in this campaign. He'll you can barely call it a war
with only 1800 losses in over three years.

Who is he......
1,800 people seems like a lot of people to have die needlessly, and the
number is a lot higher if you include contractors and other
nationalities. And how could we forget the tens of thougnds of Iraqis
who have been killed so far. I'm certain the parents and loved ones of
those killed would think the losses were of some significance, wouldn't
you?

We lost more men between
1989-1996 ( 18,000+) in the military from normal operations and the Gulf war
combined. We would have lost 1800 even if we would have stayed home. If only
people looked at the numbers and the stats.

And that justifies the invasion of a soverign country? It must,
because the Bush administration has given no other credible
justification.

Yada, yada, yada... more left-wing propaganda. Plenty of justification out threre,
'tard. It's just that you and your minions continually dismiss it as false.

Well, lets look at the record so far. We are for all intents and
purposes still in charge of a country that has just regained its
position as the largest single producer of opium. And George isn't
even getting a piece of the action. Just more dead. Great job so far
George.

And of course we are in charge of another country, but I keep
forgetting the reason we are there. Oh, yes...we are still hoping for
weapons of mass destruction but more recently we also decided to
install democracy. Or did George change the reason once more this
week. And in the meanwhile the average citizen has numerous miltia
groups to worry about, minimal utilities and a crumbling
infrastructure, a US installed government that is imploding and roving
gangs that break into houses, shoot or imprison people and stop cars at
will. The average citizen of that country sees the U.S. losing its will
and getting ready to pull out, as predicted. So what will we leave in
our wake.....another Viet Nam to collapse on itself.

I'm sure the next president will look forward to that mess.


If you can't come up with anything better you'd best be prepared to lose a lot of
nationwide elections in 2006 and 2008.

Couldn't get much worse actually. Just like the mess Johnson left for
Nixon.


George Bush is goiung to do just what Lyndon Johnson did in Viet Nam -
leave the cleanup and inevtiable messy exit to another president.
That's a fine legacy George!!

Rather than let him leave the cleanup to someone else would you support changing
things so that GWB could run again in 2008? That would give you at least one less
thing to whine about, wouldn't it?

dxAce
Michigan
USA