Browsing the FCC internet site the sheer number of reply comments by one Californian caught my eye.

8 in all on WT Docket 05-235. :-)

But, only ONE is a Comment. All the subsequent ones are REPLIES
to Comments.


One quote was particularly petulant --- "Based on the twenty items
discussed and comment on them, this commenter would urge the Commission
to ignore ARRL desires..."

Not quite verbatim, but close enough for government work. :-)


Perhaps, based on his tens of thousands of posts on the usernet, we
should urge the Commission to ignore Leonard H. Anderson desires.

It's ALREADY been done long ago. See WT Docket 98-143
for 25 January 1999...search ECFS for surname "Robeson."


BTW, it's "USENET," an acronym for 'university network' that
grew out of the old ARPANET long ago...so long it was before
the Internet went public access (in 1991).


ARRL can do NO wrong? To speak against them is heresy?


Sunnuvagun, if the English Department of a west coast university
wants to "vote" for code testing...and twenty Tennessee law
students can use WT Docket 05-235 for Moot Court practice, fine,
PROHIBIT all they want!


"ARRL is thy savior, thou shall not want in ham land..."