Thread
:
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
View Single Post
#
64
November 19th 05, 03:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Dave Heil
Posts: n/a
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
wrote:
From: K4YZ on Nov 17, 7:15 pm
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Basically, it comes down to the fact that Len thinks he's too good to
have to learn Morse Code - or anything else - for an amateur radio
license.
[inaccurate heilian imagination...]
Inaccurate is quite right. I didn't right the paragraph above your
one-liner, Windy.
I still believe that Lennie had some "run-in" with an Amateur at
some point. No doubt Lennie tried to bluff the other Amatuer into
"signing off" on a Conditional or other such thing since he already
professed to "know it all".
Poor iggorant little Dudly. Sorry to bust your big balloon,
but, other than doing some code practice in the early 1960s,
I HAVEN'T BOTHERED to get any AMATEUR radio license. :-)
There you go. You can't be bothered. So what's with the amateur radio
fetish, Len? Were you beaten with a Lightning Bug as a child?
If you wish to make a mountain out of a molehill, you can
get some staffer at Newington to look into my correspondence
with the late Vic Clark, then President of ARRL.
I'm sure it is all neatly archived. They just need to grab the "Leonard
H. Anderson" accordian folder.
That was
in the late 1970s to 1980. That MIGHT be called a "run-in"
but I'd say it was just the ultra-superior, don't bother me
attitude of the League.
....or they might have put your correspondence in the bug file.
It concerned a new movement to
eliminate the morse code test for amateur radio. All those
in-power 20 WPM Extras would have none of that!
So your ideas were dismissed and you've never gotten over it. I knew
Vic Clark. He was a fine person.
That movement would grow slowly until the FCC got convinced
(against League wishes) that a no-code-test Technician class
license got created. [see FCC 90-53 copy at
www.nocode.org]
It isn't exactly a civil rights movement, is it, Len? Did you guys
stage a big march on Newington?
"Amateur," not 'Amatuer." :-)
His one and only attempt to get a license by deceit rebuffed, he's
set upon a mission to undermine Amateur Radio at any and all
opportunities. To hell with the mere mortals, HE was a PROFESSIONAL!
Poor baby, mad as hell and can't take it anymore? :-)
That seems to sum up your attitude, poor baby.
You think elimination of the code test is "undermining"
amateur radio? I don't think so.
I think so and I'm *in* amateur radio.
Roughly half the U.S.
amateur radio community doesn't think so (if the 0.6% of
all licensees is a good sampling).
Roughly half? It looks like under half of the sampling.
Many Amateur Extras
of long experience have accepted complete removal of code
testing according to WT Docket 05-235 comments.
....and many others (and licensees of other than Extra Class ticket
holders) disagree.
"Professional?" Of course. I expect to get paid for my
work. If that is some "ethical crime" then ALL the unions
and guilds and trade organizations are "guilty!" :-)
Are you an organization, Len? I was paid for my job. I've been paid as
a musician. I'm not paid as a radio amateur. I'm not paid as an
amateur astronomer.
Do I need any fancy title to enhance my "braq
quotionent?" No.
No, I don't think you need anything additional to brag about, Len. You
seem to do just fine the way things are. You might want to brush up on
spelling if you want to include that in your "braq quotionent".
I am secure in what I can do and
what I can't do, have had a long time of operating
radio transmitters legally (half century) on the EM
spectrum from LF on through to 25 GHz.
The things you are unable to do--you're secure in them?
Amateur
licensees can't go where I've been in the EM spectrum
without holding a Commercial radio license or knowing
the applicable regulations for that service where
such transmission is permitted (such as private boat
radios) without any license.
Looks like your "braq quotionent" is doing fine.
Is a federally-supervised or VEC-supervised or
COLEM-supervised morse code test "necessary" to
"round out my experience." No. I do not consider
morse code telegraphy to be useful for anything but
hobby radio. I do not have the fantasies of
greatness in radio through morsemanship, therefore
the morsemanship is of no use to me in any way.
Let those who enjoy the mode enjoy it...and NOT
force newcomers to ANY radio service to learn it
because of federal regulations requiring it.
There's a nip in the air and the winter winds are gusting, Len. Stand
here by the lodge hall window. Use your tattered jacket sleeve to wipe
away some of the condensation.
Some of the fellows are standing by the fireplace. The flames dance and
the pleasant scent of burning oak lingers in the room. A couple of
fellows are discussing their DXCC totals on Top Band. Look--four of the
members are sipping their hot buttered rum and laughing. By golly, I
think one of them mentioned "Anderson". I think they mean *you*, Len.
You poor, ignored blighter. You're still standing out in the cold and
looking in. I guess you showed us.
Dave K8MN
Reply With Quote