Thread
:
A Direct Question for Brian P Burke, N0IMD.
View Single Post
#
9
November 22nd 05, 12:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
[email protected]
Posts: n/a
A Direct Question
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ and N0IMD back and forth....Starting with me.....
K4YZ
Jim Miccolis has NEVER called the putz anything BUT "Len" or
"Leonard" or any other abbreviation of his name that Lennie didn't
himself use, yet Lennie's pelted him for YEARS with NUMEROUS
diminutives. You have too, yet I have NEVER seen Jim refer to YOU as
anything except "Brian", "Burke", or by your callsign.
N0IMD
We'll start with you. Once you've reformed, we'll work with Jim.
K4YZ
There's nothing to "work with" with Jim.
He's already established a track record of NOT calling people by diminutives.
He doesn't do it to Lennie...he doesn't do it to Mark or you.
So...What's YOUR excuse for doing it to him?
N0IMD
Like I said, we'll start with you and when you've shown improvement for
some period of time, we can move on to Jim. Jim may take only a minute
or two, but I'm trying to be inclusive here.
You keep suggesting that there's something to "move on to", Brian.
I want to know what it is you think you have to "move on to" vis-a-vis
conducting yourself to YOUR standards in talking to/about Jim Miccolis.
What's YOUR excuse for using diminutive language towards Jim
Miccolis when he's NEVER done it to you...?!?!
Steve, K4YZ
Steve, you're blowing it. I prefer to keep my name and callsign off of
the web. As you well know, my call is convertible to my address, and I
don't want that plastered on the web, either.
Then you shouldn't be here. Or do like Markie and get a PO box
or one of those surrogate mail delivery services.
Or is this just another "I Sure Hope My Family Won't Ever See How
I REALLY Behave" redirects?
You've got 24 hours to apologize and promise not to do so again.
So I guess THIS is the "direct answer" to the "direct question"...
Why am I not surprised...?!?!
Steve, K4YZ
Whatever made me think you'd behave yourself?
Two things come to mind:
(1) If you were REALLY that concerned, you would have done a
"Markie" and changed the subject line. This now makes the FIFTH
response with your name and call in it. Obviously it's NOT that big an
issue for you.
Steve, I get to decide what is an issue for me, and I decided a long
time ago.
It was also explained to you a long time ago. Yet you ignore my wishes
because you're a jerk.
While I've got your attention, why did you change Mark's attribution?
Reply With Quote