View Single Post
  #25   Report Post  
Old December 22nd 04, 08:05 AM
Roger and Ute Brown
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Colin,
That's really interesting. I was not aware that could be done. However, I
would
think that the chances that the 6L6 circuit was configured to work in that
fashion
are slim at best (but then one never knows).
Thanks for the interesting information.
Roger, KL7Q

COLIN LAMB wrote in message
ink.net...
I am looking at "Practical Radio Telegraphy" dated 1928. The RCA P-8
transmitter is described with tube converter ET-3628.

This converter is a tube replacement for the "quenched and synchrnous gaps
formerly located on the power panel". it runs 1.5 kw using 2 tubes. One

of
the problems mentioned is "fading or swinging signals", in which it is
stated that "such difficulties may be encountered in the case of a heavy

sea
causing variation of the antenna capacity by the rolling of the vessel

...."
it is mentioned that if, on occasion, one tube burns out and there is no
replacement, the circuit may be operated as a half wave rectifier with

just
one tube. Even more interesting is what to do if both tubes fail and no
spares are available: "the operator may connect his transmitter in
plain-aerial style. This is accomplished by removing all of the

connections
from the three secondary terminals of the plate transformer and connecting
the antenna to one outside terminal of this transformer, and the ground to
the other. The safety gap shunted across the secondary terminals will

then
function as an oscillatory spark discharger."

DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME. I PRESUME MORE THAN ONE SAILOR TRIED CLEANING

BIRD
POOP OFF THE TRANSMITTING AERIAL AND BECAME WELDED TO THE DECK WITH THIS
SYSTEM.

Using a Poulsen Tikker form of detection, this transmitter may not have
sounded that much different from those that had dc on the plates.

Colin K7FM


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04