Experiance interval for Extra
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
Bill Sohl wrote:
I really have no problem with an experience criteria
(e.g.a time interval between General and Extra).
Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now
anyone can go from any license class or no license at all
to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement
would mean that many hams would need at least two exam
sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra.
More admin work = not something FCC would like.
Any idea what percent of people actually pass both
the General and the Extra in one session?
Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable
while the number of Extras just keeps growing.
Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you
haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General,
there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while
they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session
intending on the General and who came home with an Extra.
Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC
office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested
that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since
I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in
the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The
Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed.
I suspect the number is relatively small.
Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as
Techs,
every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or
Extra.
Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience
requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have
to
enforce it.
73 es HT de Jim, N2EY
|