View Single Post
  #203   Report Post  
Old December 15th 05, 03:43 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
Bill Sohl
 
Posts: n/a
Default Reasonable and unique, was One Class of Amateur Radio License?


"Dee Flint" wrote in message
. ..

"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Dee Flint" wrote

One of the elements is self training and technical knowlegde. You
encourage that by using increased privileges (spectrum and power) to get
people to study and take
additional tests.


If it were working, it would be evident on the air. But I'll encourage
you to try a little practical experiment to see if you can detect the
results in the real world.

You'll need the following materials for the experiment:

1. A reasonable sensitive receiver, hooked to a working antenna.
2. A blindfold.
3. A set of earphones.
4. No extreme hearing impairments.
5. A comfortable chair.

Seat your self at the receiver, and tune it to the TOP of a popular band
with good propagation to the USA, probably 40 or 75 meters. Don the
earphones and plug them in. Set the receiver RF gain full open and the
AF gain at a comfortable level.

Now place your blindfold over your eyes.

Slowly tune the receiver down the band. If incentive licensing is
working, when you cross over the General/Advanced boundary and again when
you cross the Advanced/Extra boundary, you should detect a noticeable
increase in the "training and technical knowlege" of the operators
because of better/cleaner signals, more sophisticated technical
discussions, and other evidence of better training and technical
knowlege. If your ear does NOT detect this sort of evidence as you tune
across those boundaries, then you can conclude (as I have) that incentive
licensing is an abject failure.

73, de Hans, K0HB


As Jim has already so ably answered, you cannot tell that sort of thing at
all. There is no way to tell whether that signal is better/cleaner since
propagation variables can impact signal quality too. There is no way to
tell if a better signal is due to better knowledge or that the particular
ham chooses to have his equipment maintained by a third party. I would
expect less sophisticated discussions in the Advanced/Extra portions
simply because the Generals may be more apt to be seeking knowledge where
the Extras may be inclined to relax.


I would expect better OPERATING skills, a higher quality of language
behavior and perhaps more technical discussions...but forget even the
technical discussions....the behavior and operating skill differences
are just not there.

Cheers,
Bill K2UNK