Thread
:
since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge, in effect, rules it is.
View Single Post
#
12
December 22nd 05, 02:33 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
I AmnotGeorgeBush
Posts: n/a
since when is using a cb against the law in the U.S.?Judge,in...
From:
(Leland*C.*Scott)
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:12:41 +0000, Landshark wrote:
********Sorry Lee, Twist is right. The Judge can not
throw out a case like this because the officer littered.
_
The judge did, and that's a fact regardless of
what twist may think.
Instead of the "He said she said" game, cite it, show it, prove it or
not.
Did the judge make an
error in dismissing the case, maybe. The
person never did tell me the exact reason why
the case was dismissed but from their
recollection of the events in court it seems it
was due to the officer littering as well.
Once again, an act that has no relation to another's act can not be user
as an excuse or defense for the original person and their actions.
I've been to traffic court myself once or twice
for tickets and I've seen people have tickets
dismissed even after admitting they did it with
a reasonable explanation. One thing you'll find
is no case is ever a slam-dunk, the judge has
a lot more latitude in what they can do than
you may think.
I never questioned their latitude.
The last ticket I got was for sliding in to the
back of somebody's pickup truck on a snow
covered icy road one night.
You banged up several vehicles, did you not?
The officer that wrote me the ticket "advised"
me to take it to court, which I did, and the
officer didn't show so it was automatically
dismissed. How nice of him not to show up.
8-))
That's what happens when the state fails to prove their case.
Regards,
Leland C. Scott
Reply With Quote