Lancer

This simple drivel has done nothing but dwindle done to a ****ing
contest and I am put of ****.

I recogneize that there are ANSI standards and I don't disagree with
any of them. I also have years of education and practical experience
with electrrostatics and how it forms and how it discharges. I don't
have to prove anything to a twit like you that can only quote
standards like it is a bible of some sorts.

You are arguing an issue by throwing standards up and I don't care to
argue standards. I made a statement and I still stand by it. All you
have done is through some standards in my face and failed to disprove
my statement.

Until you can prove me wrong in my original statement, I suggest that
any further discourse is a wate of my time and the internet bandwidth.

james


On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:21:18 GMT, Lancer wrote:

+On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:53:53 GMT, james wrote:
+
+On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:31:56 GMT, Lancer wrote:
+
++ Maybe you should read Ansi standard ANSI/ESD-S20-1999. It states
++Soldering Irons should have a tip to ground resistance of less than 1
++ohm. Companies spends tons of money each year to prevent static
++damge, and that icludes insuring that everything is at the same
++potential. Including the operator and all equipment he uses. Thats
++why iron's that are ANSI rated have a third wire, the ground. It
++wasn't put there to prevent the user from being "shocked"
+******
+
+
+
+....Snipped, because ANSI standards were written to take into acoount
+all the drivel you posted.
+
+I understand now james, there is ANSI ESD standards
+and jame ESD standards.
+
+And you think that james ESD standards are more correct, more
+accurate, and more accepted than ANSI.
+
+What other electronic standards have you written so that I can go
+though and replace all of my quality manuals that reference ANSI
+standards and replace them with james standards?
+
+Have a nice day
+
+Lancer
+
+james