dumb advice to Todd
That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.
The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is.
In Anime a character may look ten years old but in fact could really be
twenty, and vice a versa. An to answer something from something you say
on another thread about "where there's smoke there's fire" (whatever
you mean by that) does not necessary hold truth. The material on my
website falls into the category of "virtual porn" Virtual porn and
child porn is legal in the United states. Child Porn is legal, the part
that makes it illegal is the process on how it's created (the sexual
abuse of children) (Feber V California US Supreme Court 1973) Virtual
child porn is VERY legal on the grounds that the children are created
from someone imagination, and thus no sexual abuse of a real child.
(Ashcroft v FSC, US Supreme Court 2003) The Government in it arguments
in Ashcroft v. FSC argued that although no real children was harmed in
the creation of it, children could be incised by the pictures, the US
Supreme court throw that argument out as well on the grounds that there
was no evidence to link virtual child porn to real sexual abuse. The
Supreme Court also stated that if there was a big demand from virtual
child porn for pedophile then the demand for he real stuff wouldn't be
in such high demand. In other REAL Child Porn lover look for the real
stuff, not the animated stuff.
I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
about them.
First off I don't remember using the F word when it came to the FAA,
now the FCC, that I would vouch for...and the FCC is well aware of how
I think of them, long before you. As for local Law Enforcement you'll
have to refresh my memory. The Vast majority of the time on these
newsgroups I'm bashing one group....I take it back three groups, The
FCC, ARRL and the NAB. I've also been known to throw punches at the
RIAA and MPAA.
I don't need to prove anything.
The point is steve I have the right to get on here and bash a
government agency, that is protected by the Constitution. Second
without actually proof that I did what I said I did on here then it
basically falls under the same category as here say which is NOT
uphold-able in a court of law. That's why the FCC wouldn't do ****,
unless they have actually proof that I'm doing something illegal they
aren't going to do anything same-thing with FAA unless they have
actually proof that I was fly they can't do ****. you have to have
actual evidence to prove that I violated Federal Law.
YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
ultralight.
Bragging about doing something dose not necessary mean he did it.
Todd N9OGL
|