N9OGL wrote:
That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
sex acts.

The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is...(SNIP)

Rationalization, Toiddie. Pure rationalization.

High pitched voices, immature reactions. Child-like mannerisms.

Now tell me again about determining the "age" of your "characters"

I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
about them.

First off I don't remember using the F word when it came to the FAA...(SNIP)

Guess you have the same sobriety and memory issues that Markie
does.

(UNSNIP)...now the FCC, that I would vouch for...and the FCC is well aware of how
I think of them, long before you. As for local Law Enforcement you'll
have to refresh my memory. The Vast majority of the time on these
newsgroups I'm bashing one group....I take it back three groups, The
FCC, ARRL and the NAB. I've also been known to throw punches at the
RIAA and MPAA.

Most of which are due to each of those agencies expecting you to
play by the same rules everyone else does and act your age.

Obvioulsy a deficiency of your upbrining.

I don't need to prove anything.

The point is steve I have the right to get on here and bash a
government agency, that is protected by the Constitution.

Our Forefathers created these documents not to give citizens a
forum to "bash" anyone, but to put checks and balances on those powers
that men tend to corrupt.

You're just acting like a third grade brat who isn't getting to
play instead of do his homework.

Second
without actually proof that I did what I said I did on here then it
basically falls under the same category as here say which is NOT
uphold-able in a court of law.

It's archived, Toiddie.

Case law has already substantiated the validity of entering these
records into court proceedings.

That's why the FCC wouldn't do ####,
unless they have actually proof that I'm doing something illegal they
aren't going to do anything same-thing with FAA unless they have
actually proof that I was fly they can't do ####. you have to have
actual evidence to prove that I violated Federal Law.

We have YOUR admission that you're operating an illegally modified
ultralight in Google archives.

YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
ultralight.

Bragging about doing something dose not necessary mean he did it.

But you've since admitted you've "been flying".

Busted. By your own words.

Steve, K4YZ