View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 21st 06, 06:31 AM posted to rec.radio.scanner
DanOfWA
 
Posts: n/a
Default RS Pro-83 White noise problem

Scott Ehrlich wrote:

I have had a Pro-83 since last Summer (2005) and really like it. It
usually lives in the car when I am driving, and is subject to New
England's seasons.

Over the summer, it behaved fine.

This winter, though, even though the season has been rather mild, the
radio has started to act like the squelch is open full time, with
constant white noise. The scanner function properly continues to
search for active frequencies as does the signal stalker. If the
squelch was open, the scanner and signal stalker functions would
obviously be sitting on a frequency and not move.

I've tried playing with both the squelch and volume knobs, but no
change from squelch, though the volume does help "squelch" some of the
headache I can start to develop.

This white noise problem occurs regardless of whether I use
rechargable batteries or the DC adapter, and regardless of use of the
radio in the house or in the car.

The white noise has been known to subside after some time. But I ask
readers if they have also experienced this? If so, what could be
causing it? It is NOT automobile interference because the scanner
does come into the house at times and present the same problem. It
would be difficult to believe it is squelch since the rest of the
functions behave as if the squelch _is_ working properly.

What else could I be missing? Has the radio become defective? It
was purchased new, out of the box.

Thanks for any ideas/leads/hints.

Scott

Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have had a Pro-83 since last Summer (2005) and really like it. It
usually lives in the car when I am driving, and is subject to New
England's seasons.

Over the summer, it behaved fine.

This winter, though, even though the season has been rather mild, the
radio has started to act like the squelch is open full time, with
constant white noise. The scanner function properly continues to
search for active frequencies as does the signal stalker. If the
squelch was open, the scanner and signal stalker functions would
obviously be sitting on a frequency and not move.

I've tried playing with both the squelch and volume knobs, but no
change from squelch, though the volume does help "squelch" some of the
headache I can start to develop.

This white noise problem occurs regardless of whether I use
rechargable batteries or the DC adapter, and regardless of use of the
radio in the house or in the car.

The white noise has been known to subside after some time. But I ask
readers if they have also experienced this? If so, what could be
causing it? It is NOT automobile interference because the scanner
does come into the house at times and present the same problem. It
would be difficult to believe it is squelch since the rest of the
functions behave as if the squelch _is_ working properly.

What else could I be missing? Has the radio become defective? It
was purchased new, out of the box.

Thanks for any ideas/leads/hints.

Scott

here is a wierd thing to try....it just came to me
(mostly because it happened to me on a portable radio)
I live in the damp state of WA and I use to leave a radio on the seat
24/7... I started getting a hissing noise that I couldn't get rid of
and being a tad electronicly minded I took it appart to see if I could
find the problem.

Finally did (after 2 hrs) a bit of moisture had condensed inside the
radio and had caused a bit of short to one of the traces leading to the
speaker..after the moisture had departed (evaportated) it had left
minute trace of some mineral that allowed current to flow causing the hiss

After I dug out my isopropal alcohol and cleaned it up a bit (solder
traces and joints and board alll nice and clean again) the noise stopped

I don't know if that would be your problem but in a "mild" New England
weather I would expect instead of lots of very cold.. a lot of moisture
instead. With the posiblity of dust inside the unit (impossible to
avoid even in 'sealed' units it could happen

don't know if it is likely.. but ever since I had a similar problem
I always check for the simple solutions first before breaking out test
equipment

Again.....just a thot



--

NOTE: This email does not and is not to be considered as evidence of,
creation of nor proof of an existing business relationship between
myself and any other party and shall supercede any existent policy
concerning formation or continuation of a business relationship the
other party to this email has when communicating with me. The sole
determination of existing, creation or proof of business relationship
shall be determined a positive statement of creating said relationship
in the content of the email originating FROM my computer and NOT that of
the other parties computer, system or network.



================================================== ====================
NOTICE TO BULK/COMMERICAL E-MAILERS:
================================================== ====================

Pursuant to US Code, Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, p.227, any and
all unsolicited commercial E-mail sent to this address is subject to a
download and archival fee in the amount of $500 US.

Anyone who sends unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account will be
charged a $500 processing fee. Viewing this mail will be considered
official notification and acceptance of these conditions.

Failure to abide by this will result in legal action.

RCW 19.190.020
Unpermitted or misleading electronic mail -- Prohibition.
(1) No person may initiate the transmission, conspire with another to
initiate the transmission, or assist the transmission, of a commercial
electronic mail message from a computer located in Washington or to an
electronic mail address that the sender knows, or has reason to know, is
held by a Washington resident that:
(a) Uses a third party's internet domain name without permission of
the third party, or otherwise misrepresents or obscures any information
in identifying the point of origin or the transmission path of a
commercial electronic mail message; or
(b) Contains false or misleading information in the subject line.

RCW 19.190.040
Violations -- Damages.
(1) Damages to the recipient of a commercial electronic mail message
sent in violation of this chapter are five hundred dollars, or actual
damages, whichever is greater.