RadioBanter - View Single Post

April 3rd 06, 02:18 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

wrote:
On 31 Mar 2006 06:31:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
dealing honestly with the state of the of ARS is the proper funtion of
this NG

What's the "stae"...?!?! If you meant "state", perhaps it is, but

what do YOU know of it?

More than you, QUITE obviously!

Please, Morkie,

you can't even spell my name corretly

You can't even spell "correctly" correctly, so who cares?

again steve how my sexaul orientation a proper subject for this NG

Again, Morkie, why do YOU complain about others discussing sexual
issues yet you bring it into almost EVERY thread you post in!

more lies

Nope.

Google refers...All those "What Does Sexauly"...posts generated by
YOU.

You're a sexual deviate and everyone here knows it...The ONLY one
who won't let anyone forget you're a deviate is YOU!

lying agin steve

Nope.

MR slit andthe various being in his head are bound and determeined
as are you

They can only function with the "ammunition" YOU provide them,
Mark.

So far that's enough "ammo" to keep a Marine rifle company locked
and loaded for a year, so just two or three persons can make it stretch
a loooooooooooong time!

So far, your "knowledge" of the state of
Amateur Radio has been trying to weasel out of the Code test for
General.

you can't even get that right steve I want it gone for extra too

So you're a DOUBLE weasel. My bust.

and you show your colors again

Nope.

using the rights that exist under the law is weasiling

It is when you're trying to get standards lowered just because
you're too lazy to meet them.

but taking a postion on code testing does not limit my kowledge of the
ARS

I could care less about your "position" on the Code issue.
you borought it up
And
your "kowledge" on almost all Amateur Radio related discussions has
been proven, BY YOU, to be zilch-point-squat.

where?

In this forum.

Ot I forgot I disgreed with you therefore I know nothing

No...You've demonstrated that you know zilch-point-squat,
regardless of whether or not you agree with me on ANY issue...It's got
nothing to do with me...It's all about you, Mark.

Certainly not by the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, etc etc
etc.

ttry the FCC

The FCC 's not "laughing" at us, Mark.

The code rules are thiers. If they're laughinga t anyone, they
are laughing at themselves.

The only ones "laughing" are those standing on the outside
looking in!

and making the decsiosns too

What's a "decsiosns"...?!?!

I know the FCC just said we were no more important to Homelannd
security than Taxi drivers

How's that?

you comented on the thread

My comments are irrelevent to the question I asked.

YOU said that the FCC said we are no more relevent to "Homelannd"
security than Taxi drivers. I want YOU to tell me how you arrived at
that conclusion.

And what do YOU know about "Homelannd security"...???

I don't have time to list that or BW

No...YOU don't know anything about it, limitless bandwidth or
otherwise.

You're not involved.

WHY should they take Amateur Radio into this new agency?
to show we are more important than cab drivers
How
would we be of any greater service under this different umbrella?

We would be in abetter postion to retain spectrum if we were
that would allow to reamin of the same service

We're not the same service?

Last I checked we are STILL the Amateur Radio Service. Nothing's
changed.

If you really want to retain those spectrum allocations, getting
your local representitives to pass one of the several Spectrum
Protection acts that ahve been before Congress will do it better.

Here's MY point of view: There's already ENOUGH bureaucratic crap
for them to worry about in organizing "homeland defense" without having
to administer the Amateur Service.

meaning you advocate them leaving us out of it

No...It means I advocate leaving the administrative management of
the Amateur Radio Service right where it is...There's not ONE thing
that would be accomplished by changing who administers us.

However moving us to some department that's supposed to manage HS
programs would stretch already thin resources even thinner by doing so.

Even in World War 2 the Amateur Service has remained under civil
control. The creation of the War Emergency Radio Service in WW2 wasn't
even part of Amateur regulations at the time...It only accomodated
folks who WERE Amateurs into a war-related task.

from which follows we will cease sooner or later to play a role

I don't suppose you'd like to re-word that into something
understandable, would you?

We have already PROVEN that when the malodorous human solid waste
strikes the electrically operated air circulating device in an
agrevious manner, we can respond, and respond in style.

but what style?

According to anyone/everyone who's had a word to say about it,
fine style.

In the days following WTC, the Governor of New York used words
like "awesome", "professional", and "supurb" in reference to the
services provided by ARES in New York and surrounding areas.

The accolades following Katrina have been likewise flowery from
countless

"Homeland defense" wasn't even a topic of conversation on
September 10th, 2001, yet on September 11th Amateur Radio stepped up
and carried itself with style and professionalism for WEEKS after the
attacks. So said FEMA, the NY OEM, the Govermor of the State of New
York, and countless others.

so? that was yesterday

Uhhhhh....Not really.

you like resting on laurels

No, I don't.

it is dangerous you fool

You're the fool, Markie.

All of the SAME accolades have followed Katrina, which was only 6
months ago.

We were doing it for DECADES before Spetember 11th 2001, and we've
been doing it consistently since. The kudos since Katrina/Rita prove.

you need to learn something of reality

You need to learn that making such assinine and obvioulsy stupid
statements makes you look even more ludicrous.

Steve, K4YZ