an_old_friend wrote:

How can I claim? easy

Claim what? These aren't "claims". "Claims" usually require SOME
sort of truth in basis.

Maj Roesnon refuses to accept evidence that he is
wrong. when he refuses to accept evidence of of flasehoods in the eyes
of many they become his lies

Who is "Maj Roesnon" and WHAT SOLID EVIDENCE has he or she
refused to accept, Mork?

You've provided NOTHING.

No proof of your military service.

No proof of your commision in the United States Army.

No proof of your "business".

No proof of your "marriage".

No proof of your MULTIPLE college degrees.

Nothing.

The ONLY "proof" of any kind we have from you is your
grammatically fractured, misspelled, and frequent acknowledgements of
your belief in lying as a morally correct and reasonable thing to
do...And your name appears in the FCC database. Congratulations.

Take the matter of my wife for he has been offered the chance to proove
her gender one way or another . what does he do, he comits frauds by
altering a post or taking a sentence our of context instead of
follwoing up on the lead provided.

There's no fraud here, Mork, other than your attempt to use a
call-forwarded number to a sockpuppet of yours to perpetuate your
tales.

Here's the PROOF you need to submit: A PICTURE of you and your
"Mrs" holding hands, a CURRENT copy of USA Today to validate the date,
and a sign in her hand stating that she IS your wife.

indeed he attacks me for providing the lead in the first place

I "attack" you for proving that you're a liar?

That's NOT an "attack", Mork. That's the truth.

He and his confederates publish my father in law's person info weeks
ago so no further intrution realy occours by my republishing it and yet
that refference gives Robeson the ability to verify my story after all
he truned up the addres his confederate turned up the number to go with
so why should thye not trust it.

First of all, Morkie, I never "published" any such thing.

Secondly, I have been telling YOU for WEEKS what you need to do to
prove your allegations: TAKE THE PICTURE.

This suggestion of yours to use a call-forwarded number is a last
minute dodge on your part to try and re-direct the fact that YOU have
been caught in yet another lie.

Indeed he accused me of setting him up.

I didn't "accuse" you, Mork...I caught you!

what he demands is picture of my wife, so her and his confederates
can play digtal games with all over these NG's as has already been done
with my ten year old image. he demands as well I provide a curent photo
of myself

Would you rather I provide the picture, Mork? Telephoto lenses
aren't that expensive any more. And I bet my pics will be far less
flattering than the one you might provide.

he claims then he will stop harrassing me (and then denies he has ever
harrassed me)

How can I "harass" you about your "wife" if YOU provide a valid
photo that PROVES your allegeations, Mork?

The fact that you haven't done so simply PROVES that I am right.

he claimsI am not a hs graduate and when offered proof to the contary
he refuses to take me up on the matter insiting instead I provide him
access to my personal college transprits

I NEVER asked for your "transprits", Mork...Never...not
once...nada...

I asked you for the name of the institution, the degree that was
confeered upon you and when...PERIOD.

and in all this making demands he insists HE is the one being stalked

As long as you keep trying to redirect these exchanges to a
non-related newsgroup in an attempt to intimidate me, yes...YOU are the
stalker, Mork.

Steve, K4YZ