View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 9th 06, 07:21 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
K4YZ K4YZ is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Default Just When You Think Morkie Couldn't Butcher The English Language Any Worse......

SOME QUOTES FROM ONE OF MORKIE'S "BLOGS"

once upon a time hams were helpfull to newcommers
posted by mark at 11:26 PM 0 comments

Tuesday, July 25, 2006
what ever has happened to Hams
I First wrote a couple of week I stil basicaly stand by it. I have made
at leaest a few contacts most likely before the jammer/bootlegger came
on I beleive if I find I can't confrim any of them I am confident that
my gear will do EME (in an effort ot work split I did "hear" echo of
another qso meaning I can rea dhte largest stations and surley based on
the eme literure I can make an eme contact even through such
interference I ham seting up a sked to wrok in split mode with neither
frq known to other till later in an effort to asure myself I have done
what I set out to do

In response to my claim of my first EME contact someone in RRAP came
back with "I doubt you can caluate the pathloos on an EME path (or
words to that effect)

You know what I can't calualte that path loss

Indeed I would discourage anyone from trying to calculate it before
trying the path what I have heard about those numbers is pretty
discouraging

Why can I make such a contact when other say they can't or that I
can't?

simple becuase I always KNEW I would, from the first monet I heard of
EME contact which was from a question on Tech test back in 97 ( I had
heard a few days ebfore that No Code License existed I ordered the
study but it arrived only the VE session so I tired the test cold
KNOWING I would pass it then or next week or..) at the monent knowing
nothing more than that such a contact was possible with my license I
swore I would make one (or more)

I read the about the mode in detail and soon (in 97) realize I would
likely have to wait awhile to keep that vow, but from time to time I
renewed my efforts at first in data gathering a new milestone 2004 when
I heard about the results with JT modes I began to pracetice with the
early ones in terestial contact then last winter I learn of current
jt65b mode and the details of the power and anttenna requiement abit of
agonizing over wether I wanted to work with crushcrafts 31 foot 17b2
that I KNEW would work but that I have trouble steer or keeping safe in
our harsh winters or the 13b2 I thought might work (and it did work
like a charm, which it is in some sense of course) figuring I could
always use it in terrestial modes and that I could later phase it with
a second one and be assured of sucess then

but ALWAYS in mind was the KNOWLEDGE and assurance that I WOULD suceed
and that even if I had failed now it was merely a lesson learned , part
of paying my dues as it were

I knew I would one day be able to do it

I know anybody reading reading these words can do EME if they poccess 2
things

the will to reach for the Moon
the confindence to not count the obstacles

You have MY call on it KB9RQZ (sone to be /AE)

if you can't the data drop me a comment here or
http://emekb9rqz.blogspot.com/
posted by mark at 12:58 PM 0 comments

UNQUOTE

What a butchering of the English language!

What utter WHINING and SNIVVELING!

KB9RQZ at his "best"... ! ! ! !

QUOTE

Sunday, July 23, 2006
Deadly Force Michigan and me
Amusing the way those that claim I am a nonenity are always trying to
advance the notion I am not allowed to defend myself with deadly force

one can read it in the link but the readers degist abridged version
amounts that wether or not the Castle doctrines apllies in a given
(recent impending changes expand the castle doctrne in Michigan BTW
http://www.migunowners.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15323) acitizen who
is not the agressor is only required to retreat from a dangerous
sitution in event he SAFELY do so. I point out in RRAP RRCB that I am
able to walk easily and thus I would argue if one of these nuts jobs
forced me to by getting himself shoot on my land that my ability to
safely retreat is seriously limited if it exists at all, and second the
threshold to cause me bodilyharm is lower than most becuase of the same
health problems

in short since I have been forced to think i conclude that If come
accroos a vandal on my land barring his imediate flight I will quickly
exaust any option I have not to use force esp deadly force should it be
at my disposal (after all I can't put ma shotgun if since he can better
move to take and use it against and I can't enage in hand to hand
combat to restrain the Vandal without serious risks to both of us)


http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/docu...e4apr02.op.pdf

posted by mark at 1:42 AM 0 comments

UNQUOTE

No, Morkie...No one (not me, anyway) said you can't defend yourself
or your property.

What WAS said and IS law is that you CANNOT threaten deadly force
except in the face of IMMINENT THREAT.

P L E A S E get your rants right, fatboy!

ASSININE ANALOGY BETWEEN CROSSBOW AND CW DELETED.

QUOTE

Sunday, July 09, 2006
a vitocry for justice scored by the kosker ham

UNQUOTE

"vitocry"...?!?!

"kosker ham"...?!?!?

Idiot.

QUOTE

(I got the paragraph breaks back in place...Morkie's such an
idiot)

below is apost from RRAP it sorta makes the trieless but trieng prusuit
of justice seem worthwhile

Path:
g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com !newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!statler.nntpser ver.com!be5.nntpserver.com!not-for-mailFrom:
"JustaHam" Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policyReferences:
. com
. com
. com
.com
.com
.com
.com
. com

om

. comSubject: more
libel form Maj RobesonDate: Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:53:04 -0500X-Priority:
3X-MSMail-Priority: NormalX-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express
6.00.2900.2869X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V6.00.2900.2869X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; OriginalLines: 78Message-ID:
NNT P-Posting-Date: 09 Jul
2006 17:56:26 GMTX-Complaints-To: "an old friend"
wrote in message
ups.com... JustaHam
wrote: "an old freid to some a nightmare to steve" wrote in
message ps.com...
JustaHam wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dude, WHY do you bother with that fruit ****?
becuase he is deluded control freak
he can't let it go
why don't I ljust leave the NG
becuase that did not stop his harrassment I left for several years and
the harrassment contiued
with echarges made by him to the sate of Mich and Illinois of elder
abuse child molestation
his emailing of implied death threeat over the years staying just the
legal side of thing he can accurately state I have been accused of those
thing but he can say that BECAUSE he is the the ACCUSER
I deicided that misery love company and shthat if I was going to be
harrased anyway I might as well stand up to him in public
I didn't know he did all that. If you're telling the truth I guess you're right.

you can verify some of this by looking at Robeson posting history but
given the volume he has put out it isn't easy, or pleasent reading
other parts I can't prove but I believe for example what I know about

the charge made that I abuse my father, sexauly, and otherwise, is that
it was made by an LPN licensed in TN given the history between Robeson
and the fact he is the only LPN I know of from TN I form the opinion I
do on his guilt
I know the call to my home made in '98 answered by my father as I was

out of town at the time was traceble only to the ac where Robeson lives
and followed apost By Robeson (posting then as ) reciting his skill with weapons and ending with the phrase "one shot one kill even in "
I also know my father was frigthen very badly by the cal

l could somebody be setting Robeson up yes it is possible I agree but
Robeson shows no interest in even following that line claim. what he
does maintain that my being Bisexaul and the fact I will lie about
thing in threatening or dangerous sitution justifies his accusing me of
child molesting Rape , justifies his inistance that my wife is male,
that I have AIDS and other STD's etc
as I said I was geting from when I was offline so I decided I might as

well be online
Well,I should have looked before I posted. Guess I really can't blame you for getting mad.I am not going to keep posting because I don't want to fan flames.I am sorry I decided you were wrong. The truth is I assumed you were wrong because you are bisexual. Thats my problem and will work on learning about being more kind to people different from me.73,markEDMUND -- Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com
posted by mark at 3:08 PM 0 comments

UNQUOTE

Too bad he didn't get all then parts wherein you've acknowledged
your pathological lying, your deceit about your military career (as
both a "colonel" and as a "non-com")

But in any case, I added that to the disk, Mork. What a rambling
distribe that locks in your paranoid delusional character if any one
document ever did.

QUOTE

Wednesday, July 05, 2006
a stoke in the wheel

UNQUOTE

"a stoke in the wheel"...?!?!

WTF was that, Morkie?

QUOTE

was assembling my antenna for EME the refelctor was found to be
defective we shall see what crushcraft has to dsay about its warrenty
tomarrow
posted by mark at 10:38 PM 0 comments

UNQUOTE

More like you didn't follow the instructions or were trying to use
the wrong tool and broke the thing. I've been using Cushcraft antennas
for over 30 years and have not found so much as a washer out of place.

Amazing that YOU get the bogus one, eh...?!?!

Must be that "Pig Pen" cloud over your head, fatboy...Just can't
get a break, can ya...?!?!

Always the victim...Never the victor.

Wadda putz.

Steve, K4YZ