Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Roger Wiseman, maquerading as " wrote:


"maquerading?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!

"Hey..........Maquerading!" BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


Dave Heil guessing wrong again wrote:



Roger Wiseman, posing as " wrote:



Roger Wiseman, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:


He's not a member of that organization, why would he show up, stupid?


Davey never lets his lies get around the truth. I corrected your typo
for you.

It just gets better and better, Rog. You, posing as someone else
correct typos that you made posing as yet someone else. Your grip on
reality grows more and more tenuous.


PKB, stalker boy.

PKB? I haven't posed as anyone, much less corrected my own typo while
posing as yet a third person, Rog.


Sure you have, "Stagger."

It is sure that I haven't. So far, you've accused more than four people
of being "Stagger Lee". I post only as myself. Drill it into your
oversized noggin.


More lies...

You have accused numerous others of being "Stagger Lee". I have not
posed as such nor have I posted as anyone else, ever.

you do post as others. Maybe you were "masquerading" in
denial.

The masquerading is done by you, nutball. You can't post as yourself.
You simply can't. It leaves you bare and vulnerable. Instead, the
little cockroach hides from the light.

You noticed that I *didn't* mention the widowers name. Why is his name
important here? Do you want to see it besmirched along with your own
infamous moniker?


In other words, you have no name to provide. You are a liar.

You've drawn an erroneous conclusion. How dumb are you, UnWiseman?


Then name him.

For what reason? I might be willing to do it, as soon as you are able
to confirm your employment. Quid pro quo, UnWiseman.


So you can't name this non-existent person. You are a liar.

He exists and I can name him. Why play the charade, Roger? You have a
new pal who knows nothing about what you do here. Take pride in it.
Perhaps it'll lead you away your sociopathic past.



I'm told that you don't have a job so you have

Prove Roger dioesn't have a job.

plenty of time to hang out with the old timer. Does he know about your
double life on the internet? Is he your invisible friend?

You claimed he has no frioends and his neighbors didn't like him. Looks
like you lied again. I hear you've been sucking Norm Stenger under his
desk you hang out under there all the time, so you can hide behind him
when your ex-streeetwalker wife isd at the mall. She turns tricks
during her lunch break in the mall's public restrooms.


BWHAHAHAHA!

Wow! You laugh at something you wrote?


No, laughing at you, since can't provide the name of the "widower."

I didn't provide it. What is its significance? How would it make you
look any better or worse?

In other words, you are lying.

There aren't any "other words", nutball. I meant precisely the words I
used. Deal with it.


What is this fetish you have with nutballs? Did your now dead preist
daddy make you shave his? Did he make your many chins his rest for
them?

So if someone says, "You're nuts!", you think he is discussing
testicles? Wow, you really do have problems!


You're getting desperate.
You'll have to share that with the rest of your personalities.


You mean you don't want your lie about somebody to come bite you in
your fat ass in Circuit court?

You're full of manure, UnWiseman. There's not a chance in hell that
you'll ever concoct anything which will land me in any court.


Oh, just like there's no chance that a trespassing complaint wan't
filed against you and your ex-streetwalker wife with Glen Dale?

Yeah, *just* like that.

Yep.

Yep. It hasn't happened. The "charge" you gloated over didn't
materialize. The letter that you sent to my wife's place of employment
got you put into the "nut" (not testicle) file and saw to it that
security was alerted. I'd love to see you justifying a tresspassing
complaint after your statements that 1) the visit never happened, 2)
that it was "2 on 1" and 3) you weren't home. Thanks for the grins,
nutball.


Name his name, I'll bet he has you in court for libel.

A kindly old widower would have me in court for what libel--that he is a
kindly old widower? You're absurd.


So you admit he doesn't exist.

You have a reading comprehension problem. Entertain me with some more
"in court for libel" stories, Rog.

There are no "widowers" in Roger's
neighborhood north of him.

Baloney.

In fact there is a house with a couple and
two kids to the "North" than there is a mountain, Mt. Glen.

Mt. Glen--a mountain? There aren't any mountains anywhere near here,
Rog. When you have delusions, so do the hills.

You know
the one that hides that "velley."

It takes hills on both sides to make a valley, Rog.


If you want to test your libel theory, try this one on:

Roger Wiseman of Glen Dale, West Virginia is mentally deficient.


Let's see your medical and Psychologist credentials.

I didn't make a claim for having any, I made a statement to test your
libel theory. There's your ammo. Go for it. If that one didn't suit
you, how about, "Roger Wiseman of Glen Dale, West Virginia is an
unstable individual"?

There, now see what you can do with that.


How about this one, David E. Heil, K8MN, of outside of Cameron, WV is a
child molester.

See, you don't know the difference. It can be demonstrated that my
statements are true. There is no such proof for yours. In fact, your
statement would go toward proving mine. I've gone through psychological
testing and a Bureau of Diplomatic Security background check to obtain
my job. I went through frequent updates as a prerequite for keeping my
security clearance and my job. Now I'd love to see you go through such
psychological testing, UnWiseman. I don't think you want to go there.

Now run and hide under the baseboard, little cockroach, before somebody
stomps you.


It wouldn't ever be you to do that...

You continue to underestimate people, UnWiseman.


So do you, child molester.

I'm no such thing, UnWiseman. Does the idea arouse you? Does it get
you hot?

Your lame little "names" prove you just
don't have what it takes.

It is *your little name*, little UnWiseman. You've earned it.

Maybe that's why you were in the rear echelons durning 'Nam.

Was I? Are you fishing?


...you have to hide behind your
ex-whore wife.

I don't have an "ex-whore wife", Roger.


Sure she was.

That isn't correct. In fact, it is one of the things she'd like to
discuss with you. Does the idea of such things excite you?


My wife is certainly capable of stomping you though.


She does have the ass of an elephant.

She also has the teeth of a lion and the hide of a crocodile. They're
in a closet with the elephant ass.


You are extremely brave while posting filth
anonymously on the internet. As has been amply demonstrated, you a
cowardly humbug when confronted.


And you hid behind her on Roger's porch, didn't you?

Did I? Is that according to the it-never-happened scenario, the
it-was-2-on-1 scenario or the Roger-wasn't-home scenario? Well, little
cockroach, if you'd really thought I'd hide from you, you'd have had no
problem attending this past Monday's meeting. I'd have been quaking in
my boots, according to you. I reminded you of the meeting. You didn't
show up. What conclusion can we draw?

But then, you
always have somebody around when you confront Roger.

Always? I sat right next to you at the only ARES meeting you attended.
You didn't answer your door on the next opportunity for a face-to-face.
Despite frequent reminders of this past Monday's ARES meeting, you
waffled, backtracked and did not show up. Your record isn't very good.


You belong in a mental institution where you can receive the treatment
you need.

You've already been in one.

I have? Well know, that presents a problem for you. There is no record
of that anywhere.

They'd keep you away from computers and the ham bands. That
way, you could do no harm to others and you could be safe from the
others that you've had dealings with.

You aren't well and you prove it daily.

Opinions vary.

Not on your mental stability, they don't.

Some say you are a facist asshole.

At least from your various sock puppets, that seems to be the prevailing
view. But then, you're nuts.

Dave K8MN