On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:34:04 -0700, an old freind did the cha-cha, and
screamed:
FreeSpeechStore wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:19:59 -0400, Mark wildly foamed:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:07:49 GMT, Demon Lord of Confusion wrote:

nor is it for wasting kook and obviosly you haven't been reading kook
I am not o dail up

Well, there goes your excuse for net.KKKopping, then.

how so?

You don't have to worry about bandwidth, for one thing. OTOH, at least one
kookologist does have reason to worry, but obviously doesn't actually
bother. So why net.KKKop? Usenet isn't "nice", outside of the moderated
groups. It's rough-and-tumble, mean, nasty, brutal, flaming-hot, and not
for sissies ("sissies" being anyone who thinks we should all be "nicer" to
one another). Unless you have a genuine mental disorder that makes you
potentially dangerous to yourself, there is absolutely no reason we
shouldn't have at you with full-blown mockery. Net.KKKopping is
contemptible, almost as low as Outer Filth.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! TM#5
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
Vote rec.radio.amateur.policy for Busted Urinal in August 2006!
(If someone wouldn't mind seconding it...)
Also vote Cletis Perkins for:
Bolo Bullis Foam Duck (needs seconding)
Unabomber Surprise (needs seconding)
Goofy @zzed Babboon (needs seconding)
Joseph Bartlo "Pathetic Anal Pineapple" Award