"Bill" wrote in message
...
This may be true.
But if we (the USA) are treaty bound to the ITU; this treaty is
first in the heirarchy of laws in the USA (it is in the Constitution) ;-)
Thomas Jefferson and other "founding fathers" were very serious when they
warned the new nation to take making treaties very seriously.

Maybe these political are reading this post, I hope. In all cases we all
hope that the ITU WP 6E's report will be in favor of spectrum users without
modifying our rights to use amateur bands as we already observed in UHF, 1.2
and 2.4 GHz some years ago, that were partly reassigned....

Thierry
ON4SKY, LX3SKY
http://www.astrosurf.com/lombry/qsl-rfi-bpl.htm




AK wrote:
"Thierry" see my website wrote in message
...

Hi,

Do you remember the problem caused by broadcasting tests via the power

line?

A lot of radio amateur have to support the RFI causes by these tests
everywhere in Europe.
All hope is not lost.
ITU officially recognized this was unacceptable...


The problem in the States is that the ITU does not pay PAC bribes to
Congress for overlooking the obvious, and political hack FCC
commissioners
have no concept of the technology they are supposed to be regulating.
But,
what do expect out of a group of lawyers who were hired based on what
they
could do to bring home the bacon to Congress from rich special interest
groups? But who knows, maybe a bunch of US hams buying 10 KW linear
amplfiers will help the economy out and return Congress to a balanced
budget
for one more blue-moon occasion? Yeah, sure - that's it, BPL will save
the
U.S. economy.

ak K4YKZ