"Airy R. Bean" wrote in message
...
Taking the lead from the suppressors that were developed to
deal with the supposedly random Russian "Woodpecker"
is that necessarily the case?



The "Woodpecker" wasn't "supposedly" random, it was pseudo random - not the
same thing at all.

In fact, successive pulses even had 'glitches' in the same position - an
artefact of the way the short pulses were generated from a long (31 or 33-
it was along tome back) bit sequence.

As the whole idea was to give a predictable "compressed pulse" the thought
that is could be "supposedly" random is not creditable.

--
73
Brian
G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk for FREE training material for the UK
Foundation and Intermediate Licences
www.phoenixradioclub.org.uk - a RADIO club specifically for those wishing
to learn more about amateur radio