Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:19:27 -0400, jawod spake
thusly:
Who the **** are YOU to make such a statement? You snot nosed,
arrogant PRICK! You do NOT know the kind of person that I am!! Wake up
and smell the cappuccino! Code is obsolete! Knowing code does NOTHING
to make somebody an "asset to the service". And, could you explain
what makes a person an "asset to the service"?
Jeez,
Chill out, eh?
Sorry, but I get upset with people who make statements that are easily
taken as personal insults.
What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted
tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat,
spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?
Waxing poetic now?
Yes it's obsolete. Yes, it's fun.
I found it to be cold and impersonal.
Should it be used to qualify? Let the FCC decide (soon).
Here in Canada, they already have. I believe the FCC will soon.
If it is eliminated, will that change the "Service"? Maybe.
Probably not.
Will CW disappear? Probably not.
Historically, it defined ham radio, so it has a special place in the
hearts of very many hams. It's natural that they sort of cling to it.
Let them cling, they are free to do so.
Will CW's elimination be the end of ham radio? Of course not.
Ham radio will cease when all the hams die off. New hams are needed,
with or without code.
I totally agree.
My personal hope is that a significant minority of these new hams will
take up CW and learn to enjoy this mode. It truly is a fun mode. I
hope people will WANT to learn it.
I always found it to be boring.
Compulsory things are seldom welcome,,,some are necessary. Is CW a good
requirement for ham radio? I guess it has probably outlived its day.
A requirement related to other digital modes would make a good
replacement. True?
I completely agree. If you want to filter out the less serious, then
use a relevant method. Here in Canada, in order to get a no-code
licence, you must get at least 80% on the technical. And technical
prowess will always be important regardless of the mode of
communication.
|