From: Dave Heil on Sun, Sep 24 2006 2:59 pm
wrote:
From: on Sat, Sep 23 2006 7:06 pm
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: Paul W. Schleck on Fri, Sep 22 2006 4:09 pm
writes:
From: Paul W. Schleck on Thurs, Sep 21 2006 12:21 pm
writes:
I lose no privileges whether morse code testing disappears or not.
Then WHY are you so angry and antagonistic to those of
us who want to eliminate the code test? No harm will come
to you if the test is eliminated.
Heil is fixated on his one-cannot-possibly-talk-about-
getting-into-amateur-radio until one is already in
amateur radio. [the "chicken and the egg" arrived
at the same time logic...]
You've talked. You've commented to the FCC.
Ah, but Heil has NOT answered his illogical stance on
WHO may comment or otherwise talk about amateur radio
regulations.
You've commented, ranted,
railed and have generally acted like a small child here.
Now, now, you are beginning to act angry and petulant
again. :-)
No one at any state's DMV needs hold a drivers license.
WRONG. Driving inspectors MUST hold valid drivers
licenses in Illinois and California.
You don't work at the DMV or the FCC.
Clear something up for us: Do you REQUIRE that anyone
work at a Department of Motor Vehicles in order to talk
and discuss US amateur radio regulations?!?
A most irrational statement you made.
Here's a plain and simple fact: The FCC does NOT require
any commissioner or staffer to be granted amateur radio
licenses in order to regulated US civil radio. Really.
You don't regulate.
Regulate WHAT? There are many many things that I
regularly regulate. :-) US civil radio regulations
are NOT something I regulate.
You aren't a radio amateur.
True, but what DOES that have to do with talking about
US amateur radio regulations?
You have no stake in amateur radio.
Now, now, Count Dracula, don't get worried. :-)
Tsk, you are still angry and petulant. NOT a good
attitude.
YOU are an amateur extra but YOU do NOT regulate US
amateur radio. The FCC does that, grants amateur
radio licenses, shuts down amateur radio stations for
rules violations, can even establish federal fines for
such violations.
I'm fully aware that I don't "rule" amateur radio.
You don't rule there. You don't regulate amateur radio.
I'm fully aware that the FCC does "rule" amateur radio.
Are you SURE about that? You vacillate back and forth
so much...
I'm fully aware that you aren't the FCC or a radio amateur.
Remarkable 'awareness!' Do you think that will get you
a cookie? :-)
The FCC tells Heil "what to do" and Heil has no choice
but to obey...or lose his precious amateur extra class
license.
When it comes to amateur radio, you are not bound by FCC regulations
unless you decide to take to the air illegally.
Tsk, angry, petulant, and now ACCUSATORY of something you
state "I am going to do!"
You ARE wrong about FCC regulations. I am very much bound
by FCC regulations, both by radio but also for certain
wireline communications. You really need the entire Title
47 C.F.R. to confirm that (for your own edification).
I'm quite happy to observe the regulations governing amateur radio in
this country. I've received not as much as a single warning letter from
the FCC in nearly 43 years.
Marvelous! Should we chip in get you a nice little gold
star for your report card?
I don't recall that anyone was accusing you of anything
other than a bad temper, irrational behavior, or trying
to imitate some Waffen SS offizier in here. FCC doesn't
regulate behavior.
You aren't entering amateur radio.
I'm "not"?!?" What do you KNOW what I'm doing? Are you
Claire Voyant in some ham radio column or something?
I've encountered no sane person posting here who plays less well with
others than Leonard H. Anderson.
Now, now, you are adding a mean streak to your bad temper,
petulance, and irrationality. Try playing "nice." :-)
I've not ordered you to obtain an amateur
radio license or not to obtain an amateur radio license.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. You certainly gone on and on and on and
on about my "not having one!" Why is that?
I've not told
you to comment to the FCC or not to comment to the FCC.
You've certainly gone on and on and on and on and
on about attempting ridicule of what I've written
to the FCC. :-)
If you don't like my "smug arrogance", change your own tactics.
Now, now, you ARE telling me what to do! Hypocrite.
Len, why don't you address the IEEE Code of Ethics?
Oh, but I DID! Here is the address again:
IEEE
445 Hoes Lane
Box 1331
Piscatawny, NJ 08855-1331
USA
I apologize for not giving the web address:
www.ieee.org
You are free to talk all you want with the IEEE Ethics
Committee.
You might even consider membership in the IEEE, but you
will have to get three IEEE members to vouch for you.
You probably won't live long enough to qualify for a
Life Member status (it is a free upgrade and doesn't
require dues payments after that).
Anyone who chooses to obtain an amateur radio license may do so without
any interference from me.
How wonderfully magnanimous of Heil! :-)
You've been braying in this newsgroup for better than a decade.
"Braying?" Neighhhh, Wilbur. :-)
You have not made an attempt to obtain an amateur radio license.
Now, now, there you go again with your bad temper and
terrible insistence that ONLY amateur licensees can
talk about amateur radio!
I had nothing to do with your failure to do so.
"Failure?!?" Tsk, tsk, never tried.
I've had a Commercial radio operator license since 1956.
Why do you insist I have an AMATEUR license?
Tsk, Heil is exhibiting irrationality again.
You're a victim of inertia.
Must be that why my anti-gravity project failed; Something
was holding me down! Should I channel Isaac N. for a cure?
Well, maybe you're right. I've had an abiding interest,
indeed a GREAT interest in women since the beginning of
my teens...but, never ONCE had I any interest in BECOMING
one! How about that?
Beep, beep,
Life Member
IEEE is a Professional Association with 397 thousand members
worldwide.