RadioBanter - View Single Post

[email protected] · September 27th 06, 07:19 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

From: on Tues, Sep 26 2006 5:30 pm

wrote:
on Sat, Sep 23 2006 7:06 pm
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Paul W. Schleck on Fri, Sep 22 2006 4:09 pm
writes:
Paul W. Schleck on Thurs, Sep 21 2006 12:21 pm
writes:

Why did you - repeat you - bring up the late Lloyd
Bentsen at all? Did Lloyd Bentsen have an amateur
radio license? :-)

Heck, Leonard, it should put you at ease. You don't have one either.

Good grief! Did you have to query QRZ on that one, too?

Robesin did.

They are birds of a feather, Brian.

They might share a brain...

At least Heil didn't consume time and resources in a useless exercise
as Robesin has.

I will dispute that. Very little of Heil's messaging in
here appears useful...except to him. It is almost
entirely about demeaning lots of others. He only makes
nice-nice to other pro-coders.

The only difference
between them is better literacy in Heil's postings. But,
the same hatred of losing anything and bluffmanship
is evident in both.

I see a lot more difference between them than that, but without getting
into a great big ****ing match with either of them, I'll sum it up in
that one of them should be kept away from society, the other is merely
annoying and needs to stick to meaningful exchanges on the air, such as
"you're 59."

Har! Yes, good old "you are 5-9-9!" :-)

...even if a repeat is requested on half of what the
other station transmitted. :-)

Heil is fixated on his one-cannot-possibly-talk-about-
getting-into-amateur-radio until one is already in
amateur radio. [the "chicken and the egg" arrived
at the same time logic...]

Now the FCC does NOT require any commissioner or staffer
to hold an amateur radio license grant in order to
REGULATE US amateur radio. Heil's concept of who rules
is faulty.

They tend to ignore facts.

"Tend?" Hell, no, they OUTRIGHT ignore them.

Heil often expresses disdain and contempt for anyone on
the "outside" of amateur radio attempting to "tell radio
amateurs what to do." That is also illogical and faulty
but grounded in extreme emotional territorialism. He
does NOT rule yet pretends to be the ruler in behavior to
others.

The FCC tells Heil "what to do" and Heil has no choice
but to obey...or lose his precious amateur extra class
license. In any discussion with others about a singular
test to ENTER amateur radio, Heil does not play well and
assumes He can tell others what to do...and does not
hesitate to do so with his typical smug arrogance.

That is NOT a good picture to present to the public about
US amateur radio. But, I doubt that Heil cares. Heil
has His and the rest can go do something else. :-(

Doesn't matter if every newcomer sees their antics for the next eight
decades in the archives, they are right, Right, RIGHT and you are
wrong. Proof? W0EX/SK said he wanted to destroy the ARS since he
couldn't have ham radio his way. Like Robeswine's present antics, no
one said a word...

Hypocrisy in action.

However, Hans Brakob told the Robeswine off several times.
Hans is about the oldest tymest ham in this newsgroup, a
morseman, but one who doesn't think the morse code test
is necessary. Hans earned that right.

The key ingredient is always that morse code test. Anyone
against it are always "wrong" but those for it are always
"right"...in the pro-code-test morsemen's definition of
truth, justice, and the morse way.

["signature" omitted due to all the amateur hissy fits
about being a Life Member of a Professional Association]