Thread
:
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
View Single Post
#
54
October 11th 06, 03:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Papa Dog
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
In article et,
says...
Papa Dog wrote in
:
In article . net,
says...
Thanks for posting that chuck. I've never broken any of those on the
air or on usenet. Maybe now Markie and everyone else will see why CW
is important.
Thanks again and Keep up the good work.
73 de Slow Code
You need to read them again SC. You break them daily on usenet. You're
not considerate. You're down right unfriendly to some and You're about
unprogressive as they come.
73
Chris
You think that's bad? Wait until HF sounds 11 meters and you can't find a
decent contact anywhere. You'll see I was right.
I crawled out of my hole around restructuring time. Then the ARRL and FCC
screwed ham radio. I went back in my hole again. Now the FCC and it
appears with the blessings of the ARRL is planning to toss CW all
together. I come out of my hole to fight for the integrity of ham radio
once again, but when the R&O comes out eliminating CW, I'll crawl back
into my hole again. Leaving you and everyone else the problem of trying to
deal with poor behavior and operating practice on the bands. The result
of dumbing down licensing.
Outcome based education doesn't work, what makes you think outcome based
licensing will?
SC
You still won't acknowledge your poor behavior that really hurts your
cause.
Chris
Reply With Quote
Papa Dog
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Papa Dog