Thread
:
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
View Single Post
#
57
October 12th 06, 03:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Slow Code
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
Papa Dog wrote in
:
In article . net,
says...
Papa Dog wrote in
:
In article . net,
says...
Phil Wheeler wrote in
:
AC7PN wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
Or is it like talking to someone on CB?
SC
The answer is "yes it is a real contact" and so far as you were
communicating with some one using a radio it also is "like
talking to someone on CB."
Dude, your arrogance is showing.
I would have said ignorance
73, Phil W7OX
Don't tell me You want to dumb down ham radio now as well. Where
have all the communicators gone?
SC
Any 12 year old can learn code in 2 weeks. Getting rid of it would
not dumb down Ham radio at all. Code is a good thing to know.
Whether you use it or not is a personal preference. I think
programming you're own software to send code yourself and building
your own radio is a lot more technical than learning code.
73
Chris
But people don't want to be skilled at anything anymore. They don't
want to make an effort to learn CW, they may not make an effort to
learn other things to advance themselves technically either.
SC
If a 12 year old can learn it I don't consider it much of a technical
skill. Nothing at all technical about CW. Building a transmitter, now
that takes somw technical know how.
Chris
Well if it's not a problem to learn, let's keep the requirement and raise
it to 13WPM. It's a bit boring doing code at 5 words per minute, and at
13 WPM you can copy someones call for help almost three times as fast.
SC
Reply With Quote
Slow Code
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Slow Code