Thread
:
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
View Single Post
#
9
October 17th 06, 03:11 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Papa Dog
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 125
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs?
In article .net,
says...
wrote in
oups.com:
wrote:
On 13 Oct 2006 07:59:20 -0700,
wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
You may
not agree with their suggested solutions, but you'd have to agree
that we have a problem. Right?
notice you have gotten no reply
Having waited almost a week for a reasonable response...
The silence is telling. I believe you are right, he doesn't care..
indeed and it gets worse I am sure he believes the solution is worse
than the problem because it does not promote cw forever
Slow Code is only here to troll. He's a fan of CW, but not a big
enough fan to actually defent the continued testing of Morse Code with
any valid reasoning.
You see no value in being effective communicators,
The most effective communication is plain english!
73
Chris
Reply With Quote
Papa Dog
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Papa Dog