"KC4UAI" wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:

I was part of the big RRAP CW and anti-ARRL fights of the late 90's up
until restructuring went into effect, then my posting tapered off.
I'll disappear again once the FCC totally kills off ham radio by
eliminating the code requirement. When that happens, I'll wear a strip
of black electricians tape around my arm in memorial and observe
twenty-four hours of radio silence in memory of a once proud service.

Rest in Peace, Ham Radio. You were a good and faithful friend.


... .-.. --- .-- -.-. --- -.. .
slow code
-. . . -.. ... - --- - .... .. -. -.-
needs to think
-. -... --- - .... .. ...
nbot his
.- .-. --. ..- -- . -. - ... .-.-.-
arguments.
- .... . .- .-. .-. .-.. .. ... -. --- -
the arrl is not
- .-. -.-- .. -. --. - --- -.- .. .-.. .-..
trying to kill
.... .- -- .-. .- -.. .. ---
ham radio
.- .-.. .. ...- . .-.-.-
alive.
.... .. ... .. -.. . .- ...
his ideas
.-- --- ..- .-.. -.. -.- .. .-.. .-..
would kill
.... .- -- .-. .- .. -.. --- .- -. -..
ham raido and
.... .. ... -... . .-.. --- ...- . -..
his beloved
.-.- .-- .-- .. - ... .. - .-.-.-
aaw wits it.


For those of you who find CW a bit tedious to decode this way it says:

Slow Code needs to think about his arguments.

The ARRL is not trying to kill CW but keep ham radio alive.

His ideas would kill ham radio and his beloved CW with it.


KC4UAI



I see your point, it's on top of your head. Ham radio has to sound like CB
in order to survive.

SC