Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:52:20 -0500, jawod wrote:
Based upon your microscopic linguistic analysis,
It is a reciprocal (analysis/expression) characteristic inherent to
successful engineering; others use tea leaves (couched in trade argot)
to present results of dubious quality.
I imagine you use a
Microsoft product (at least conversing with you is similar to using
one).
Hi John,
You obviously have never read an Intel hardware manual (circa MDS-80).
BTW (seriously), will the new Mac products work with EZNEC?
This is something YOU should investigate. Mac now uses that
one-and-the-same Intel engine. It is suggested in the press that it
runs both operating systems. It costs more to do the same thing, but
you get that cool logo.
For everyone's notes: EZnec runs quite nicely on an Intel based iMac.
I prefer OpenSource servers, applications,
and Linux. I haven't bought a M$ product in this millennium having
experienced the Windows Me platform (Chairman Bill's fin du cercle
joke on us all).
I work both Microsoft, OSX, and am learning Linux.
Not that it was asked for, but my experience has been that MS OS is
great if you have paid support staff to make it run, Linux is nice, but
every once in a while, it kicks us back to 1985, (sorry - unforgivable
in 2006) and when I absolutely have to get it done with a minimum of..
what is the technical term? Oh yeah - with a minimum of peckering
around, I'll use OSX any day.
And my G5 Mac is cool to look at too - inside and out.
As I pointed out earlier, your question is answered in 10 minutes to
all variations that I offered. That analysis even gives degrees of
"better" as expressed in KHz and dB (quantifiable engineering terms
commonly used in serious antenna discussion).
Of course one can get the answer from a modeling program. Of course,
the modeling program won't tell *why*.
Here is a video of me trying to get a modeling program to tell me why my
antenna design worked like it said...
http://www.break.com/index/patiencechild.html
As a spoiler, I will
offer that the diagonal placement seriously disrupts both resonance
AND gain to the tune of 100s of KHz and 3-4 dB. Of course, the
qualifier "seriously" was meaningful only to me; that is, until I
quantified it.
Now that's better!
- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -