On Feb 27, 11:02 pm, John Smith I wrote:
wrote:

...

So after N number of legit postings, a person could slide in an
accusation of rape, and it would just sail on through?

I'm not so sure that I want to participate in that "Good Old Boy"
network, not being a Good Old Boy.

hhac:

Hmmmm.

Well, you gotta admit, keep the pervs and potty mouths out is NOT a bad
idea. Even though we only have one female that can hang with us, Dee,
smut, sick behavior and perversion in mixed company troubles me. Those
guys over in moderated DON'T have it all wrong.

Robesin might be capable of posting 20 or so legit postings, just
waiting to slide in a zinger. And he fully capable posting smut, sick
behavio[u]r, and perversion... witness his infamous "eat my excrement"
post.

Personally, I live for argument, debate and conflict. Let's face it,
every good book, movie, etc. needs a good protagonist and an good
antagonist--makes the story interesting.

Without them, there is no story.

Some of the people who make
this newsgroup the most interesting and entertaining for me do NOT agree
with me!

--but--

Personally, I frequent both a church and a bar. I have one manner of
behavior for the church and yet another for the bar--so far, this has
seemed to work ... and then of course, there is the bedroom.
evil grin

I support a good "family news group." But, I love free speech and
conflict in an adult forum--one where we can "let the fur fly" and then
all shake hands and agree to disagree in the end ...

We'll see ... wink

Regards,
JS

We'll see.

BTW, there's a post over there about WWII line-of-sight
communications.