On Mar 24, 12:36�pm, wrote:
On 24 Mar 2007 09:32:24 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 24, 11:20?am, wrote:
On 24 Mar 2007 06:32:54 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 23, 11:48?pm, wrote:
break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What rule is that Morkie?

the rule claims prevent me from answering posts not addressed to me

hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Here is a prime example of you twisting things around. * * *never said
that you shouldn't answer post unless they are addressed to you.

lying sack of ****http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Prove where I have lied. *

you have done that for me

you are the one that make stupid accusation and you never back em up

you make up and fail to follow them hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Mark define "them", your fourth grade level responses are not very
articulate. If you are going to respond, at least you could write in
a manner that adequately addresses the post, not with little short
snipits. Unless of course you low IQ prevents you from authoring an
adequate response, you may ask for consideration in light of your BIF
(borderline intellectual functioning). Once again you have failed to
show adequate proof of where I have lied. Now you accuse me of
"making accusation and you never back em up." Provide an example of
where I have done what you say, unless of course you have not proof
whatsoever. I have provided examples of your behavior and have had
some success in finally getting you to admit the truth.

At one time you indicated that you never lie and you don't hijack
threads.

But recently, you finally admitted to doing both of these behaviors,
the truth will set you free.

"Extreme Hypocrite Mark Morgan"

Dloyd