RHF wrote:

On Apr 7, 7:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Apr 7, 3:49 pm, dxAce wrote:
wrote:
"How many people know this?"

"The FCC has their own court and judges. No jury and no right to an
attorney. Where is th ACLU on this?"

http://groups.google.com/group/ba.br...ad/thread/1a0a...

"Office of Administrative Law Judges"

http://www.fcc.gov/oalj/

"Secret Court's Judges Were Warned About NSA Spy Data" Washington
Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...06/02/08/AR200...

Yea, fishy all right - the FCC's courts will conveniently look the
other way about cases of protected contour interference !

As far as I know one is entitled to legal representation before the FCC.

The FCC, much like the Social Security system (where one is entitled to legal representation), rely upon Administrative Law Judges to handle various matters
before them.

For that matter, here in Michigan, if one has a dispute with Unemployment Compensation, and if one continues to appeal their case, they'll wind up in a hearing
with an Administrative Law Judge, (where one is also entitled to legal representation).

- Show quoted text -

Yeah - Most Civilian Federal Agency Appeals
Systems work kinda like a Military Courts Martial :
* Their Court
* Their Judge
* Their Attorneys
* All the Re$ource$ of the Federal Government
STACKED UP AGAINST YOU ! ! ! ! !

I've won both times I went up against an ALJ.

You lose.

- Show quoted text -

DX Ace - Clearly Your Are . . .
The Exception That Proves The Rule !

No, I'm merely an individual who pressed his case. Not an exception at all. If one qualifies under the law, one wins. Pretty simple.

You lose, again.

I'm thinking now that both you, and Edweenie, need to run along.