Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 03:56:01 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

To my mind, Tom's experiment doesn't prove Cecil et al wrong, but that
should not be taken in any way to imply support for their proposition.

Hi Owen,

To my mind, I don't know what Tom's experiment does prove. It lacks
too much to be even called data.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

It doesn't matter what it lacks or doesn't lack. There is no experiment
that anyone can do that will satisfy Cecil that he's wrong, but there
are an infinity of vague, disconnected references and twisted
interpretations that he will seize upon to prove he's right.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH