"Bill Jeffrey" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann -

Thanks for the rescan. Much better this time, though I'm not exactly sure
why. According to my graphics program, both were scanned (or at least
saved) at 96 dpi, but the first one had considerably fewer pixels -
640x102 vs 790x124 (almost exactly 6:5 ratio, FWIW).

In addition to the rescan, the cleanup along the bottom edge was welcome -
and the whole thing appears much sharper than the first version.

Thanks again

Bill Jeffrey

I'm at somewhat of a loss as to how the original turned out as it did, too.
I went to the effort of doing a fairly high res scan and resizing it to
match the other scans this time. Just glad I could help.