Thread
:
Filters
View Single Post
#
2
March 3rd 08, 09:28 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
dxAce
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Filters
wrote:
msushi wrote in another thread:
"Noise is measured in volts per root Hz. To get the noise over a
bandwidth, you multiply by the square root of the bandwidth. So using
a 10% narrower filter reduces the noise by 4.8%. So narrowing the
bandwidth helps, but it is not a cure".
Indeed, it is not a cure. Narrowing the bandwidth of a filter also
narrows the audio response, so the narrower the filter is the poorer
will be the audio response and the more difficult it becomes to render
a rare faint DX signal readable. It is vital to my MW DXing of AM
stations that I get as fuller sound as possible. These signals are
very faint and often severely garbled by atmospherics. At best it is a
great challenge to read and identify these signals with enough
information to request and get a QSL. The fullest possible sound is
necessary to clearly hear all the speech harmonics and sibilants, so
as a result I usually DX in ECSS USB mode, but use a comparatively
wide 3.0 Khz filter setting on my Icom IC-756PROIII.
My favourite filter in the R7 is the 3 kHz.
I just wonder why you'd limit yourself to DX'ing in USB mode. Wouldn't you want
to shift sidebands depending upon the interference?
Reply With Quote
dxAce
View Public Profile
Find all posts by dxAce