Richard Clark wrote:

...
Unfortunately, by your conjecture
I always issue the challenge of
taping a wire from a 5 watt RF source to their temple.
this implies a co-equivalent risk where neither activity have any data
to support that a risk exists. Merely having a fear does not create
that missing data or Saddam's WMD would have been on display in the
white house rose garden.
...

Funny, didn't someone just mention how it was known tobacco was harmful
to us--long before there was "proper proof."

This argument would hold much more water if microwave freqs from .9Ghz
to 20+ Ghz were not so efficient at heating/affecting water and other
polarized molecules. Now, didn't I read, somewhere, that the brain is
mainly composed of "fat"--fat IS a polarized molecule, and the brain
does contain water ...

I think most prudent men would be leery of holding a device emitting
freqs capable of cooking food next to their brain ...

Ever heard of bluetooth?

Regards,
JS