On Sep 14, 9:45*pm, wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
One thing is certain, Gauss states that static particles cannot
radiate in free space as there is no exchange of flux
and Maxwell includes the vector associated with the weak force where
gravity is non existent or zero !.
Best regards
Art

You've just unvailed the dirty secret that antennas don't work in
space and that all the so called communications with Appolo, Pioneer,
Mir, ISS, the shuttle and all telecommunications satellites is faked.

Now you had better be on the watch for the black helicopters for reveling
this.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

No I have not invalidated the concept of radiation in space since I
cannot rule out the root cause of the phenomia of
two insecting magnetic fields At the same time I have little belief in
the total veracity of antenna programs because of assumptions made on
preparation
I also suspect that the expansion to rediation in free space was
concluded without due consideration as the programs depict the only
change as zero reflection with the absence of earth with out
consideration to other factors. I am not denying radiation in out
space cannot exist only that I do not know how it is created without
influence from outside or added forces. At the same time there are
more indications of correctness in my analysis via well known
phenomina than the puzzle that I have present. I rely only on the
logic presented by other people which I have no reason to discredit
most of which have stood the test of time. The computer programs were
based on the laws of Maxwell so assumptions should not have been
necessary nor the revisions made over the years One assumption is
clearly in error is based on sino soidal current flow where a full
wave radiator is considered to be a tank circuit
where energy is moved via pulses, obviously I am missing something
here as well as the mathematical constant of subtraction for free
space.
There is a problem but the root cause is obviously unknown thus my
theorem should not be discounted Formulas formed by Einstein on
relativity have included the same laws of Maxwell who includes the
weak force which is nothing but a vector at the present time such that
all forces equal zero. The latter was chosen as a fact thus there was
no option to conclude that the gap created via vectors was a
unidentifiable force often stated as an anti gravitational force thus
without gravity all forces must change to conform to equilibrium,
something I cannot accept per Gauss.
Jim, I am just being honest about my findings and at the same time
pointing to areas of disagreement by the unknowns that are presented.
Only the test of time is of value as more knoweledge is accumulated
Regards
Art