View Single Post
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 28th 08, 06:18 PM posted to alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics.republicans,rec.radio.shortwave
Starkiller Starkiller is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
Default Why Barack Obama should worry

On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:41:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 28, 10:22*am, wrote:
On Sep 28, 10:05*am, wrote:

And S&L "Keating 5" Conspirator McCain should not "worry"??? *McCain
has NO CREDIBILITY when it comes to accepting gifts from bankers /
lobbyists.


Dennis


A typical Neo-Commie Liberal Fascist propaganda post.

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of
corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the
larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The
five senators;

Alan Cranston (D-CA)
Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ)
Donald W. Riegle (D-MI)
John Glenn (D-OH)
John McCain (R-AZ)

were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of
the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target
of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).

After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined
in 1991 that Alan Cranston(D-CA), Dennis DeConcini(D-AZ), and Donald
Riegle(D-MI) had substantially and improperly interfered with the
FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings.

Senators John Glenn and JOHN McCAIN were CLEARED OF HAVING ACTED
IMPROPERLY.

Only Glenn and McCain ran for re-election, and they were BOTH RE-
ELECTED.


McCain was REPRIMANDED BY THE SENATE ETHICS COMMITTEE, NOT "CLEARED"

http://query.nytimes.com/search/site...ing&srchst=cse

Dennis


Seems if you were telling the truth you could point to a specific
article instead of a searh page full of Op-eds.

Get back to us when you have something intelligent worth adding.












'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is
big enough to take away everything you have.'

"You cannot enrich the poor by impoverishing the rich."